112 Where ARE U vs Cronometer: Calorie Counter
112 Where ARE U
AREU
Google Play
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 2.8M installs
VS
Cronometer: Calorie Counter
Cronometer Software Inc.
Google Play
$464.6K/mo
~$5.58M/yr · 5.4M installs
Revenue winner
Cronometer: Calorie Counter wins
+46463100% vs other
Installs winner
Cronometer: Calorie Counter wins
+97% vs other
MAU winner
Cronometer: Calorie Counter wins
+154% vs other
Rating winner
Cronometer: Calorie Counter wins
+60% vs other
Why Cronometer: Calorie Counter is winning
Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Cronometer: Calorie Counter earns roughly 464631× more per month than 112 Where ARE U - $464.6K vs $0.
- Subscription model. Cronometer: Calorie Counter runs a $16.40/mo subscription that compounds; 112 Where ARE U relies on one-shot IAP or ads.
- Bigger install base. Cronometer: Calorie Counter has ~5.4M lifetime installs vs 112 Where ARE U's ~2.8M - 2.0× the funnel top.
- Better app store reviews. Cronometer: Calorie Counter sits at 4.63★ vs 2.89★ - store algorithms reward higher-rated apps with more impressions.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Cronometer: Calorie Counter report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
112 Where ARE U
vs
Cronometer: Calorie Counter
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$0
▶
$464.6K
Annual revenue (est.)
$0
▶
$5.58M
Lifetime installs (est.)
2.8M
▶
5.4M
Monthly active users (est.)?
309K
▶
785K
App Store rating
2.89★
▶
4.63★
Total ratings
7K
▶
53K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
▶
$16.40
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jul 29, 2014
- Last updated
- Mar 11, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 3.10.0.0
- Languages
- -
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jul 13, 2016
- Last updated
- Apr 28, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- VARY
- Languages
- -
112 Where ARE U trajectory
Cronometer: Calorie Counter trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, 112 Where ARE U or Cronometer: Calorie Counter? v
Cronometer: Calorie Counter earns about $464.6K per month, while 112 Where ARE U earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap (~$464.6K more per month for Cronometer: Calorie Counter). Annual revenue: 112 Where ARE U ≈ $0/year, Cronometer: Calorie Counter ≈ $5.58M/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, 112 Where ARE U or Cronometer: Calorie Counter? v
Cronometer: Calorie Counter leads with about 5.4M estimated downloads vs 2.8M for 112 Where ARE U - a 2.0× gap. 112 Where ARE U reports 1,000,000+ installs on Google Play. Cronometer: Calorie Counter reports 5,000,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are 112 Where ARE U and Cronometer: Calorie Counter in the same Google Play category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do 112 Where ARE U and Cronometer: Calorie Counter offer? v
112 Where ARE U: no IAP detected on the public listing. Cronometer: Calorie Counter: IAP range $2.99 - $89.99 per item. 112 Where ARE U runs a "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)" monetization model; Cronometer: Calorie Counter runs "Subscription (~$16.40/mo, fitness-sub)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, 112 Where ARE U or Cronometer: Calorie Counter? v
Cronometer: Calorie Counter edges ahead with ★ 4.6 vs ★ 2.9 (gap of 1.7 stars). Rating volume: 112 Where ARE U 6 ratings, Cronometer: Calorie Counter 8K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these 112 Where ARE U vs Cronometer: Calorie Counter revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $0 for 112 Where ARE U and $464.6K for Cronometer: Calorie Counter are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare 112 Where ARE U or Cronometer: Calorie Counter to a different Google Play app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.