112 Where ARE U vs Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker

112 Where ARE U

AREU
Google Play
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 2.8M installs
VS

Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker

Yazio
Google Play
$4.68M/mo
~$56.18M/yr · 55.7M installs
Revenue winner Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker wins +468174700% vs other
Installs winner Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker wins +1915% vs other
MAU winner Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker wins +1429% vs other
Rating winner Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker wins +52% vs other

Why Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker is winning

Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.

  1. Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker earns roughly 4681747× more per month than 112 Where ARE U - $4.68M vs $0.
  2. Subscription model. Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker runs a $45.79/mo subscription that compounds; 112 Where ARE U relies on one-shot IAP or ads.
  3. Bigger install base. Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker has ~55.7M lifetime installs vs 112 Where ARE U's ~2.8M - 20.2× the funnel top.
  4. Better app store reviews. Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker sits at 4.40★ vs 2.89★ - store algorithms reward higher-rated apps with more impressions.

→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker report

Side-by-side metrics

Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.

112 Where ARE U
vs
Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$0
▶
$4.68M
Annual revenue (est.)
$0
▶
$56.18M
Lifetime installs (est.)
2.8M
▶
55.7M
Monthly active users (est.)?
309K
▶
4.7M
App Store rating
2.89★
▶
4.40★
Total ratings
7K
▶
805K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
▶
$45.79
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers

112 Where ARE U

AREU
Google Play
Category
Health & Fitness
Price
Free
Released
Jul 29, 2014
Last updated
Mar 11, 2026
File size
-
Content rating
Everyone
Version
3.10.0.0
Languages
-
View full 112 Where ARE U report →

Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker

Yazio
Google Play
Category
Health & Fitness
Price
Free
Released
Apr 23, 2014
Last updated
May 5, 2026
File size
-
Content rating
Everyone
Version
12.83.1
Languages
-
View full Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker report →

112 Where ARE U trajectory

JunJulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMay

Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker trajectory

JunJulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMay

Related app pages

112 Where ARE U Play Store page →Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker Play Store page →

Related comparisons

Cal AI Calorie Tracker iOS vs 112 Where Are U Android112 Where Are U Android vs Calorie Counter Mynetdiary Android112 Where Are U Android vs Cal AI Food Calorie Tracker Android112 Where Are U Android vs Myfitnesspal Calorie Counter AndroidFitbit Health Fitness iOS vs 112 Where Are U AndroidStompers Step Counter Friends iOS vs 112 Where Are U Android

Compare another pair

FAQ

Which makes more money, 112 Where ARE U or Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker? v
Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker earns about $4.68M per month, while 112 Where ARE U earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap (~$4.68M more per month for Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker). Annual revenue: 112 Where ARE U ≈ $0/year, Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker ≈ $56.18M/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, 112 Where ARE U or Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker? v
Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker leads with about 55.7M estimated downloads vs 2.8M for 112 Where ARE U - a 20.2× gap. 112 Where ARE U reports 1,000,000+ installs on Google Play. Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker reports 50,000,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are 112 Where ARE U and Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker in the same Google Play category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do 112 Where ARE U and Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker offer? v
112 Where ARE U: no IAP detected on the public listing. Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker: IAP range $6.99 - $299.99 per item. 112 Where ARE U runs a "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)" monetization model; Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker runs "Subscription (~$45.79/mo, fitness-sub)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, 112 Where ARE U or Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker? v
Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker edges ahead with ★ 4.4 vs ★ 2.9 (gap of 1.5 stars). Rating volume: 112 Where ARE U 6 ratings, Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker 3K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these 112 Where ARE U vs Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $0 for 112 Where ARE U and $4.68M for Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare 112 Where ARE U or Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker to a different Google Play app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.