安否確認サービス2：トヨクモ vs Qconcursos
安否確認サービス2：トヨクモ
トヨクモ株式会社
Google Play
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 588K installs
VS
Qconcursos
Quest Edu
Google Play
$72.5K/mo
~$870.0K/yr · 3.0M installs
Revenue winner
Qconcursos wins
+7250100% vs other
Installs winner
Qconcursos wins
+408% vs other
MAU winner
Qconcursos wins
+263% vs other
Rating winner
Qconcursos wins
+483% vs other
Why Qconcursos is winning
Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Qconcursos earns roughly 72501× more per month than 安否確認サービス2：トヨクモ - $72.5K vs $0.
- Subscription model. Qconcursos runs a $30.10/mo subscription that compounds; 安否確認サービス2：トヨクモ relies on one-shot IAP or ads.
- Bigger install base. Qconcursos has ~3.0M lifetime installs vs 安否確認サービス2：トヨクモ's ~588K - 5.1× the funnel top.
- Better app store reviews. Qconcursos sits at 4.83★ vs 0.00★ - store algorithms reward higher-rated apps with more impressions.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Qconcursos report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
安否確認サービス2：トヨクモ
vs
Qconcursos
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$0
▶
$72.5K
Annual revenue (est.)
$0
▶
$870.0K
Lifetime installs (est.)
588K
▶
3.0M
Monthly active users (est.)?
49K
▶
179K
App Store rating
-
▶
4.83★
Total ratings
0
▶
145K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
▶
$30.10
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Business
- Price
- Free
- Released
- -
- Last updated
- Nov 19, 2025
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 2.0.25
- Languages
- -
- Category
- Education
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Mar 4, 2021
- Last updated
- May 8, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 2.12.3
- Languages
- -
安否確認サービス2：トヨクモ trajectory
Qconcursos trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, 安否確認サービス2：トヨクモ or Qconcursos? v
Qconcursos earns about $72.5K per month, while 安否確認サービス2：トヨクモ earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap (~$72.5K more per month for Qconcursos). Annual revenue: 安否確認サービス2：トヨクモ ≈ $0/year, Qconcursos ≈ $870.0K/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, 安否確認サービス2：トヨクモ or Qconcursos? v
Qconcursos leads with about 3.0M estimated downloads vs 588K for 安否確認サービス2：トヨクモ - a 5.1× gap. 安否確認サービス2：トヨクモ reports 500,000+ installs on Google Play. Qconcursos reports 1,000,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are 安否確認サービス2：トヨクモ and Qconcursos in the same Google Play category and competing for the same money? v
No - 安否確認サービス2：トヨクモ is in Business and Qconcursos is in Education. They share screen-time attention but earn money in different niches: 安否確認サービス2：トヨクモ from business monetization patterns, Qconcursos from education.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do 安否確認サービス2：トヨクモ and Qconcursos offer? v
安否確認サービス2：トヨクモ: no IAP detected on the public listing. Qconcursos: IAP range $5.49 - $164.99 per item. 安否確認サービス2：トヨクモ runs a "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)" monetization model; Qconcursos runs "Subscription (~$30.10/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, 安否確認サービス2：トヨクモ or Qconcursos? v
Qconcursos edges ahead with a higher overall score (gap of 4.8 stars). Rating volume: 安否確認サービス2：トヨクモ 0 ratings, Qconcursos 11 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these 安否確認サービス2：トヨクモ vs Qconcursos revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $0 for 安否確認サービス2：トヨクモ and $72.5K for Qconcursos are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Business / Education) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare 安否確認サービス2：トヨクモ or Qconcursos to a different Google Play app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.