１級土木施工管理技術検定試験 「30日合格プログラム」 vs 辰已の肢別 [司試・予備・LS]
１級土木施工管理技術検定試験 「30日合格プログラム」
ReCorrect Inc.
Google Play
$400/mo
~$4.8K/yr · 2K installs
VS
辰已の肢別 [司試・予備・LS]
TATSUMI Co.,Ltd.
Google Play
$684/mo
~$8.2K/yr · 6K installs
Revenue winner
辰已の肢別 [司試・予備・LS] wins
+71% vs other
Installs winner
辰已の肢別 [司試・予備・LS] wins
+172% vs other
MAU winner
辰已の肢別 [司試・予備・LS] wins
+172% vs other
Rating winnerTied
Why 辰已の肢別 [司試・予備・LS] is winning
Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- 辰已の肢別 [司試・予備・LS] earns roughly 2× more per month than １級土木施工管理技術検定試験 「30日合格プログラム」 - $684 vs $400.
- Subscription model. 辰已の肢別 [司試・予備・LS] runs a $79.64/mo subscription that compounds; １級土木施工管理技術検定試験 「30日合格プログラム」 relies on one-shot IAP or ads.
- Bigger install base. 辰已の肢別 [司試・予備・LS] has ~6K lifetime installs vs １級土木施工管理技術検定試験 「30日合格プログラム」's ~2K - 2.7× the funnel top.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full 辰已の肢別 [司試・予備・LS] report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
１級土木施工管理技術検定試験 「30日合格プログラム」
vs
辰已の肢別 [司試・予備・LS]
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$400
▶
$684
Annual revenue (est.)
$4.8K
▶
$8.2K
Lifetime installs (est.)
2K
▶
6K
Monthly active users (est.)?
233.632
▶
634.704
App Store rating
-
=
-
Total ratings
0
=
0
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
▶
$79.64
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Education
- Price
- USD15.99
- Released
- Feb 8, 2022
- Last updated
- Apr 24, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 1.2.1
- Languages
- -
- Category
- Education
- Price
- Free
- Released
- -
- Last updated
- Oct 24, 2025
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 1.1.10
- Languages
- -
１級土木施工管理技術検定試験 「30日合格プログラム」 trajectory
辰已の肢別 [司試・予備・LS] trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, １級土木施工管理技術検定試験 「30日合格プログラム」 or 辰已の肢別 [司試・予備・LS]? v
辰已の肢別 [司試・予備・LS] earns about $684 per month, while １級土木施工管理技術検定試験 「30日合格プログラム」 earns about $400. That is a 1.7× revenue gap (~$284 more per month for 辰已の肢別 [司試・予備・LS]). Annual revenue: １級土木施工管理技術検定試験 「30日合格プログラム」 ≈ $4.8K/year, 辰已の肢別 [司試・予備・LS] ≈ $8.2K/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, １級土木施工管理技術検定試験 「30日合格プログラム」 or 辰已の肢別 [司試・予備・LS]? v
辰已の肢別 [司試・予備・LS] leads with about 6K estimated downloads vs 2K for １級土木施工管理技術検定試験 「30日合格プログラム」 - a 2.7× gap. １級土木施工管理技術検定試験 「30日合格プログラム」 reports 1,000+ installs on Google Play. 辰已の肢別 [司試・予備・LS] reports 5,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are １級土木施工管理技術検定試験 「30日合格プログラム」 and 辰已の肢別 [司試・予備・LS] in the same Google Play category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Education category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do １級土木施工管理技術検定試験 「30日合格プログラム」 and 辰已の肢別 [司試・予備・LS] offer? v
１級土木施工管理技術検定試験 「30日合格プログラム」: no IAP detected on the public listing. 辰已の肢別 [司試・予備・LS]: IAP range $26.99 - $234.99 per item. １級土木施工管理技術検定試験 「30日合格プログラム」 runs a "Paid app ($15.99)" monetization model; 辰已の肢別 [司試・予備・LS] runs "Subscription (~$79.64/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
How accurate are these １級土木施工管理技術検定試験 「30日合格プログラム」 vs 辰已の肢別 [司試・予備・LS] revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $400 for １級土木施工管理技術検定試験 「30日合格プログラム」 and $684 for 辰已の肢別 [司試・予備・LS] are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Education) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare １級土木施工管理技術検定試験 「30日合格プログラム」 or 辰已の肢別 [司試・予備・LS] to a different Google Play app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.