321 Vegan vs 麦当劳McDonald's - 到店取餐 麦咖啡 麦乐送
321 Vegan
Louis Lambrecht
App Store
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 0 installs
VS
麦当劳McDonald's - 到店取餐 麦咖啡 麦乐送
McDonald's (China) Co., Ltd.
App Store
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 593K installs
Revenue winnerTied
Installs winner
麦当劳McDonald's - 到店取餐 麦咖啡 麦乐送 wins
+59304000% vs other
MAU winner
麦当劳McDonald's - 到店取餐 麦咖啡 麦乐送 wins
+7057176% vs other
Rating winner
麦当劳McDonald's - 到店取餐 麦咖啡 麦乐送 wins
+484% vs other
Why 321 Vegan is winning
Top 1 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Subscription model. 321 Vegan runs a $3.99/mo subscription that compounds; 麦当劳McDonald's - 到店取餐 麦咖啡 麦乐送 relies on one-shot IAP or ads.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full 321 Vegan report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
321 Vegan
vs
麦当劳McDonald's - 到店取餐 麦咖啡 麦乐送
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$0
=
$0
Annual revenue (est.)
$0
=
$0
Lifetime installs (est.)
0
▶
593K
Monthly active users (est.)?
0
▶
71K
App Store rating
-
▶
4.84★
Total ratings
0
▶
7K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$3.99
◀
No sub
IAP tiers detected
2 tiers
◀
0 tiers
- Category
- Food & Drink
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Oct 17, 2024
- Last updated
- May 9, 2026
- File size
- 53.2 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 4.1.0
- Languages
- French
- Category
- Food & Drink
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jan 25, 2016
- Last updated
- May 7, 2026
- File size
- 111.9 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 7.0.33.0
- Languages
- English, Chinese
321 Vegan trajectory
麦当劳McDonald's - 到店取餐 麦咖啡 麦乐送 trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, 321 Vegan or 麦当劳McDonald's - 到店取餐 麦咖啡 麦乐送? v
麦当劳McDonald's - 到店取餐 麦咖啡 麦乐送 earns about $0 per month, while 321 Vegan earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap. Annual revenue: 321 Vegan ≈ $0/year, 麦当劳McDonald's - 到店取餐 麦咖啡 麦乐送 ≈ $0/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, 321 Vegan or 麦当劳McDonald's - 到店取餐 麦咖啡 麦乐送? v
麦当劳McDonald's - 到店取餐 麦咖啡 麦乐送 leads with about 593K estimated downloads vs 0 for 321 Vegan - a ∞× gap. 321 Vegan's App Store downloads are estimated from 0 ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. 麦当劳McDonald's - 到店取餐 麦咖啡 麦乐送's App Store downloads are estimated from 7K ratings.
Are 321 Vegan and 麦当劳McDonald's - 到店取餐 麦咖啡 麦乐送 in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Food & Drink category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do 321 Vegan and 麦当劳McDonald's - 到店取餐 麦咖啡 麦乐送 offer? v
321 Vegan: IAP range 2 tiers detected. 麦当劳McDonald's - 到店取餐 麦咖啡 麦乐送: no IAP detected on the public listing. 321 Vegan runs a "Subscription (~$3.99/mo)" monetization model; 麦当劳McDonald's - 到店取餐 麦咖啡 麦乐送 runs "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, 321 Vegan or 麦当劳McDonald's - 到店取餐 麦咖啡 麦乐送? v
麦当劳McDonald's - 到店取餐 麦咖啡 麦乐送 edges ahead with a higher overall score (gap of 4.8 stars). Rating volume: 321 Vegan 0 ratings, 麦当劳McDonald's - 到店取餐 麦咖啡 麦乐送 7K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these 321 Vegan vs 麦当劳McDonald's - 到店取餐 麦咖啡 麦乐送 revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $0 for 321 Vegan and $0 for 麦当劳McDonald's - 到店取餐 麦咖啡 麦乐送 are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Food & Drink) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare 321 Vegan or 麦当劳McDonald's - 到店取餐 麦咖啡 麦乐送 to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.