99: Rides, Food, Pay vs PeakFinder
99: Rides, Food, Pay
99 Taxis Desenvolvimento de Softwares Ltda. - Epp
App Store
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 1.8M installs
VS
PeakFinder
PeakFinder GmbH
App Store
$168.6K/mo
~$2.02M/yr · 1.3M installs
Revenue winner
PeakFinder wins
+16863700% vs other
Installs winner
99: Rides, Food, Pay wins
+44% vs other
MAU winner
99: Rides, Food, Pay wins
+45% vs other
Rating winner
99: Rides, Food, Pay wins
+0% vs other
Why PeakFinder is winning
Top 1 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- PeakFinder earns roughly 168637× more per month than 99: Rides, Food, Pay - $168.6K vs $0.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full PeakFinder report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
99: Rides, Food, Pay
vs
PeakFinder
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$0
▶
$168.6K
Annual revenue (est.)
$0
▶
$2.02M
Lifetime installs (est.)
1.8M
◀
1.3M
Monthly active users (est.)?
335K
◀
231K
App Store rating
4.73★
◀
4.71★
Total ratings
17K
◀
12K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
=
No sub
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Travel
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Aug 21, 2012
- Last updated
- May 7, 2026
- File size
- 341.9 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 6.60.6
- Languages
- English, Portuguese, Chinese, Chinese
- Category
- Travel
- Price
- USD4.99
- Released
- Mar 12, 2010
- Last updated
- May 8, 2026
- File size
- 40.3 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 4.8.70
- Languages
- English, French, German, Italian, Japanese, Korean +4 more
99: Rides, Food, Pay trajectory
PeakFinder trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, 99: Rides, Food, Pay or PeakFinder? v
PeakFinder earns about $168.6K per month, while 99: Rides, Food, Pay earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap (~$168.6K more per month for PeakFinder). Annual revenue: 99: Rides, Food, Pay ≈ $0/year, PeakFinder ≈ $2.02M/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, 99: Rides, Food, Pay or PeakFinder? v
99: Rides, Food, Pay leads with about 1.8M estimated downloads vs 1.3M for PeakFinder - a 1.4× gap. 99: Rides, Food, Pay's App Store downloads are estimated from 17K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. PeakFinder's App Store downloads are estimated from 12K ratings.
Are 99: Rides, Food, Pay and PeakFinder in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Travel category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
Do 99: Rides, Food, Pay and PeakFinder have in-app purchases? v
99: Rides, Food, Pay does not appear to offer in-app purchases on its public listing. PeakFinder does not appear to offer in-app purchases. Monetization model: 99: Rides, Food, Pay runs "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)", PeakFinder runs "Paid app ($4.99)".
Which has better ratings, 99: Rides, Food, Pay or PeakFinder? v
99: Rides, Food, Pay edges ahead with ★ 4.7 vs ★ 4.7 (gap of 0.0 stars). Rating volume: 99: Rides, Food, Pay 17K ratings, PeakFinder 12K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these 99: Rides, Food, Pay vs PeakFinder revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $0 for 99: Rides, Food, Pay and $168.6K for PeakFinder are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Travel) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare 99: Rides, Food, Pay or PeakFinder to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.