Ace of Horizons: Watch Face vs ARS Pip Walk
Ace of Horizons: Watch Face
Nataša Petek
Google Play
$30/mo
~$360/yr · 1K installs
VS
ARS Pip Walk
Arsanna Studio
Google Play
$33/mo
~$394/yr · 2K installs
Revenue winner
ARS Pip Walk wins
+10% vs other
Installs winner
ARS Pip Walk wins
+60% vs other
MAU winner
ARS Pip Walk wins
+50% vs other
Rating winner
Ace of Horizons: Watch Face wins
+22% vs other
Why ARS Pip Walk is winning
Top 1 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Bigger install base. ARS Pip Walk has ~2K lifetime installs vs Ace of Horizons: Watch Face's ~1K - 1.6× the funnel top.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full ARS Pip Walk report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Ace of Horizons: Watch Face
vs
ARS Pip Walk
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$30
▶
$33
Annual revenue (est.)
$360
▶
$394
Lifetime installs (est.)
1K
▶
2K
Monthly active users (est.)?
160.083
▶
239.899
App Store rating
5.00★
◀
4.11★
Total ratings
9
▶
38
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
=
No sub
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Personalization
- Price
- USD1.89
- Released
- Apr 1, 2024
- Last updated
- Jul 2, 2025
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- VARY
- Languages
- -
- Category
- Personalization
- Price
- USD1.29
- Released
- Mar 20, 2025
- Last updated
- Oct 10, 2025
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- VARY
- Languages
- -
Ace of Horizons: Watch Face trajectory
ARS Pip Walk trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Ace of Horizons: Watch Face or ARS Pip Walk? v
ARS Pip Walk earns about $33 per month, while Ace of Horizons: Watch Face earns about $30. That is a 1.1× revenue gap (~$3 more per month for ARS Pip Walk). Annual revenue: Ace of Horizons: Watch Face ≈ $360/year, ARS Pip Walk ≈ $394/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Ace of Horizons: Watch Face or ARS Pip Walk? v
ARS Pip Walk leads with about 2K estimated downloads vs 1K for Ace of Horizons: Watch Face - a 1.6× gap. Ace of Horizons: Watch Face reports 1,000+ installs on Google Play. ARS Pip Walk reports 1,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Ace of Horizons: Watch Face and ARS Pip Walk in the same Google Play category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Personalization category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
Do Ace of Horizons: Watch Face and ARS Pip Walk have in-app purchases? v
Ace of Horizons: Watch Face does not appear to offer in-app purchases on its public listing. ARS Pip Walk does not appear to offer in-app purchases. Monetization model: Ace of Horizons: Watch Face runs "Paid app ($1.89)", ARS Pip Walk runs "Paid app ($1.29)".
Which has better ratings, Ace of Horizons: Watch Face or ARS Pip Walk? v
Ace of Horizons: Watch Face edges ahead with ★ 5.0 vs ★ 4.1 (gap of 0.9 stars). Rating volume: Ace of Horizons: Watch Face 2 ratings, ARS Pip Walk 3 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Ace of Horizons: Watch Face vs ARS Pip Walk revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $30 for Ace of Horizons: Watch Face and $33 for ARS Pip Walk are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Personalization) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Ace of Horizons: Watch Face or ARS Pip Walk to a different Google Play app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.