Ace of Horizons: Watch Face vs MFT WF 12
Ace of Horizons: Watch Face
Nataša Petek
Google Play
$30/mo
~$359/yr · 1K installs
VS
MFT WF 12
mft watchface
Google Play
$45/mo
~$537/yr · 4K installs
Revenue winner
MFT WF 12 wins
+50% vs other
Installs winner
MFT WF 12 wins
+186% vs other
MAU winner
MFT WF 12 wins
+131% vs other
Rating winner
Ace of Horizons: Watch Face wins
+14% vs other
Why MFT WF 12 is winning
Top 2 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- MFT WF 12 earns roughly 2× more per month than Ace of Horizons: Watch Face - $45 vs $30.
- Bigger install base. MFT WF 12 has ~4K lifetime installs vs Ace of Horizons: Watch Face's ~1K - 2.9× the funnel top.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full MFT WF 12 report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Ace of Horizons: Watch Face
vs
MFT WF 12
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$30
▶
$45
Annual revenue (est.)
$359
▶
$537
Lifetime installs (est.)
1K
▶
4K
Monthly active users (est.)?
159.72
▶
369.46
App Store rating
5.00★
◀
4.40★
Total ratings
9
▶
86
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
=
No sub
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Personalization
- Price
- USD1.89
- Released
- Apr 1, 2024
- Last updated
- Jul 2, 2025
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- VARY
- Languages
- -
- Category
- Personalization
- Price
- USD0.99
- Released
- Apr 12, 2024
- Last updated
- Aug 3, 2024
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- VARY
- Languages
- -
Ace of Horizons: Watch Face trajectory
MFT WF 12 trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Ace of Horizons: Watch Face or MFT WF 12? v
MFT WF 12 earns about $45 per month, while Ace of Horizons: Watch Face earns about $30. That is a 1.5× revenue gap (~$15 more per month for MFT WF 12). Annual revenue: Ace of Horizons: Watch Face ≈ $359/year, MFT WF 12 ≈ $537/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Ace of Horizons: Watch Face or MFT WF 12? v
MFT WF 12 leads with about 4K estimated downloads vs 1K for Ace of Horizons: Watch Face - a 2.9× gap. Ace of Horizons: Watch Face reports 1,000+ installs on Google Play. MFT WF 12 reports 1,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Ace of Horizons: Watch Face and MFT WF 12 in the same Google Play category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Personalization category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
Do Ace of Horizons: Watch Face and MFT WF 12 have in-app purchases? v
Ace of Horizons: Watch Face does not appear to offer in-app purchases on its public listing. MFT WF 12 does not appear to offer in-app purchases. Monetization model: Ace of Horizons: Watch Face runs "Paid app ($1.89)", MFT WF 12 runs "Paid app ($0.99)".
Which has better ratings, Ace of Horizons: Watch Face or MFT WF 12? v
Ace of Horizons: Watch Face edges ahead with ★ 5.0 vs ★ 4.4 (gap of 0.6 stars). Rating volume: Ace of Horizons: Watch Face 2 ratings, MFT WF 12 86 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Ace of Horizons: Watch Face vs MFT WF 12 revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $30 for Ace of Horizons: Watch Face and $45 for MFT WF 12 are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Personalization) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Ace of Horizons: Watch Face or MFT WF 12 to a different Google Play app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.