adidas Running: Run tracker vs Google Health (Fitbit)
adidas Running: Run tracker
adidas
App Store
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 15.8M installs
VS
Google Health (Fitbit)
Google
App Store
$1.56M/mo
~$18.69M/yr · 101.6M installs
Revenue winner
Google Health (Fitbit) wins
+155708400% vs other
Installs winner
Google Health (Fitbit) wins
+543% vs other
MAU winner
Google Health (Fitbit) wins
+134% vs other
Rating winner
adidas Running: Run tracker wins
+7% vs other
Why Google Health (Fitbit) is winning
Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Google Health (Fitbit) earns roughly 1557084× more per month than adidas Running: Run tracker - $1.56M vs $0.
- Subscription model. Google Health (Fitbit) runs a $9.99/mo subscription that compounds; adidas Running: Run tracker relies on one-shot IAP or ads.
- Bigger install base. Google Health (Fitbit) has ~101.6M lifetime installs vs adidas Running: Run tracker's ~15.8M - 6.4× the funnel top.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Google Health (Fitbit) report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
adidas Running: Run tracker
vs
Google Health (Fitbit)
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$0
▶
$1.56M
Annual revenue (est.)
$0
▶
$18.69M
Lifetime installs (est.)
15.8M
▶
101.6M
Monthly active users (est.)?
3.1M
▶
7.2M
App Store rating
4.80★
◀
4.49★
Total ratings
105K
▶
678K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
▶
$9.99
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
▶
2 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Nov 23, 2009
- Last updated
- Jun 2, 2026
- File size
- 268.4 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 14.8.0
- Languages
- Dutch, English, French, German, Italian, Japanese +5 more
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Oct 18, 2011
- Last updated
- Jun 23, 2026
- File size
- 548.8 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 5.02.1
- Languages
- Bulgarian, Croatian, Czech, Danish, Dutch, English +26 more
adidas Running: Run tracker trajectory
Google Health (Fitbit) trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, adidas Running: Run tracker or Google Health (Fitbit)? v
Google Health (Fitbit) earns about $1.56M per month, while adidas Running: Run tracker earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap (~$1.56M more per month for Google Health (Fitbit)). Annual revenue: adidas Running: Run tracker ≈ $0/year, Google Health (Fitbit) ≈ $18.69M/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, adidas Running: Run tracker or Google Health (Fitbit)? v
Google Health (Fitbit) leads with about 101.6M estimated downloads vs 15.8M for adidas Running: Run tracker - a 6.4× gap. adidas Running: Run tracker's App Store downloads are estimated from 105K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Google Health (Fitbit)'s App Store downloads are estimated from 678K ratings.
Are adidas Running: Run tracker and Google Health (Fitbit) in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do adidas Running: Run tracker and Google Health (Fitbit) offer? v
adidas Running: Run tracker: no IAP detected on the public listing. Google Health (Fitbit): IAP range 2 tiers detected. adidas Running: Run tracker runs a "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)" monetization model; Google Health (Fitbit) runs "Subscription (~$6.67/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, adidas Running: Run tracker or Google Health (Fitbit)? v
adidas Running: Run tracker edges ahead with ★ 4.8 vs ★ 4.5 (gap of 0.3 stars). Rating volume: adidas Running: Run tracker 105K ratings, Google Health (Fitbit) 678K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these adidas Running: Run tracker vs Google Health (Fitbit) revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $0 for adidas Running: Run tracker and $1.56M for Google Health (Fitbit) are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare adidas Running: Run tracker or Google Health (Fitbit) to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.