ahm vs Cronometer: Calorie Counter

ahm

Medibank Private Limited
Google Play
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 334K installs
VS

Cronometer: Calorie Counter

Cronometer Software Inc.
Google Play
$464.6K/mo
~$5.58M/yr · 5.4M installs
Revenue winner Cronometer: Calorie Counter wins +46463100% vs other
Installs winner Cronometer: Calorie Counter wins +1532% vs other
MAU winner Cronometer: Calorie Counter wins +1177% vs other
Rating winner Cronometer: Calorie Counter wins +463% vs other

Why Cronometer: Calorie Counter is winning

Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.

  1. Cronometer: Calorie Counter earns roughly 464631× more per month than ahm - $464.6K vs $0.
  2. Subscription model. Cronometer: Calorie Counter runs a $16.40/mo subscription that compounds; ahm relies on one-shot IAP or ads.
  3. Bigger install base. Cronometer: Calorie Counter has ~5.4M lifetime installs vs ahm's ~334K - 16.3× the funnel top.
  4. Better app store reviews. Cronometer: Calorie Counter sits at 4.63★ vs 0.00★ - store algorithms reward higher-rated apps with more impressions.

Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Cronometer: Calorie Counter report

Side-by-side metrics

Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.

ahm
vs
Cronometer: Calorie Counter
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$0
$464.6K
Annual revenue (est.)
$0
$5.58M
Lifetime installs (est.)
334K
5.4M
Monthly active users (est.)?
61K
785K
App Store rating
-
4.63★
Total ratings
0
53K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
$16.40
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers

ahm

Medibank Private Limited
Google Play
Category
Health & Fitness
Price
Free
Released
-
Last updated
Apr 27, 2026
File size
-
Content rating
Everyone
Version
50.6.0
Languages
-
View full ahm report →

Cronometer: Calorie Counter

Cronometer Software Inc.
Google Play
Category
Health & Fitness
Price
Free
Released
Jul 13, 2016
Last updated
Apr 28, 2026
File size
-
Content rating
Everyone
Version
VARY
Languages
-
View full Cronometer: Calorie Counter report →

ahm trajectory

JunJulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMay

Cronometer: Calorie Counter trajectory

JunJulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMay

FAQ

Which makes more money, ahm or Cronometer: Calorie Counter? v
Cronometer: Calorie Counter earns about $464.6K per month, while ahm earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap (~$464.6K more per month for Cronometer: Calorie Counter). Annual revenue: ahm ≈ $0/year, Cronometer: Calorie Counter ≈ $5.58M/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, ahm or Cronometer: Calorie Counter? v
Cronometer: Calorie Counter leads with about 5.4M estimated downloads vs 334K for ahm - a 16.3× gap. ahm reports 100,000+ installs on Google Play. Cronometer: Calorie Counter reports 5,000,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are ahm and Cronometer: Calorie Counter in the same Google Play category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do ahm and Cronometer: Calorie Counter offer? v
ahm: no IAP detected on the public listing. Cronometer: Calorie Counter: IAP range $2.99 - $89.99 per item. ahm runs a "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)" monetization model; Cronometer: Calorie Counter runs "Subscription (~$16.40/mo, fitness-sub)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, ahm or Cronometer: Calorie Counter? v
Cronometer: Calorie Counter edges ahead with a higher overall score (gap of 4.6 stars). Rating volume: ahm 0 ratings, Cronometer: Calorie Counter 8K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these ahm vs Cronometer: Calorie Counter revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $0 for ahm and $464.6K for Cronometer: Calorie Counter are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare ahm or Cronometer: Calorie Counter to a different Google Play app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.