ahm OSHC vs FitOn Workouts & Fitness Plans
ahm OSHC
Medibank Private Limited
App Store
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 0 installs
VS
FitOn Workouts & Fitness Plans
FitOn
Google Play
$602.7K/mo
~$7.23M/yr · 10.2M installs
Revenue winner
FitOn Workouts & Fitness Plans wins
+60273900% vs other
Installs winner
FitOn Workouts & Fitness Plans wins
+1022020300% vs other
MAU winner
FitOn Workouts & Fitness Plans wins
+77673543% vs other
Rating winner
FitOn Workouts & Fitness Plans wins
+443% vs other
Why FitOn Workouts & Fitness Plans is winning
Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- FitOn Workouts & Fitness Plans earns roughly 602739× more per month than ahm OSHC - $602.7K vs $0.
- Premium pricing. FitOn Workouts & Fitness Plans charges $42.41/mo vs ahm OSHC's $13.00/mo - higher ARPU per converted user.
- Bigger install base. FitOn Workouts & Fitness Plans has ~10.2M lifetime installs vs ahm OSHC's ~0 - 10220203.0× the funnel top.
- Better app store reviews. FitOn Workouts & Fitness Plans sits at 4.43★ vs 0.00★ - store algorithms reward higher-rated apps with more impressions.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full FitOn Workouts & Fitness Plans report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
ahm OSHC
vs
FitOn Workouts & Fitness Plans
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$0
▶
$602.7K
Annual revenue (est.)
$0
▶
$7.23M
Lifetime installs (est.)
0
▶
10.2M
Monthly active users (est.)?
0
▶
777K
App Store rating
-
▶
4.43★
Total ratings
0
▶
97K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$13.00
▶
$42.41
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Apr 5, 2019
- Last updated
- Nov 6, 2025
- File size
- 59.8 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 2.8
- Languages
- English, Chinese
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Dec 17, 2018
- Last updated
- Jun 8, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- VARY
- Languages
- -
ahm OSHC trajectory
FitOn Workouts & Fitness Plans trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, ahm OSHC or FitOn Workouts & Fitness Plans? v
FitOn Workouts & Fitness Plans earns about $602.7K per month, while ahm OSHC earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap (~$602.7K more per month for FitOn Workouts & Fitness Plans). Annual revenue: ahm OSHC ≈ $0/year, FitOn Workouts & Fitness Plans ≈ $7.23M/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store / Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, ahm OSHC or FitOn Workouts & Fitness Plans? v
FitOn Workouts & Fitness Plans leads with about 10.2M estimated downloads vs 0 for ahm OSHC - a ∞× gap. ahm OSHC's App Store downloads are estimated from 0 ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. FitOn Workouts & Fitness Plans reports 10,000,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are ahm OSHC and FitOn Workouts & Fitness Plans in the same App Store category on each store and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do ahm OSHC and FitOn Workouts & Fitness Plans offer? v
ahm OSHC: no IAP detected on the public listing. FitOn Workouts & Fitness Plans: IAP range $14.99 - $119.99 per item. ahm OSHC runs a "Subscription (~$13.00/mo, wellness)" monetization model; FitOn Workouts & Fitness Plans runs "Subscription (~$42.41/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, ahm OSHC or FitOn Workouts & Fitness Plans? v
FitOn Workouts & Fitness Plans edges ahead with a higher overall score (gap of 4.4 stars). Rating volume: ahm OSHC 0 ratings, FitOn Workouts & Fitness Plans 11K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these ahm OSHC vs FitOn Workouts & Fitness Plans revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $0 for ahm OSHC and $602.7K for FitOn Workouts & Fitness Plans are derived from App Store grossing rank / Google Play install ranges, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare ahm OSHC or FitOn Workouts & Fitness Plans to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store or Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.