ahm OSHC vs BitePal: AI Calorie Counter
ahm OSHC
Medibank Private Limited
App Store
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 0 installs
VS
BitePal: AI Calorie Counter
RefaceLithuania
Google Play
$347.2K/mo
~$4.17M/yr · 4.3M installs
Revenue winner
BitePal: AI Calorie Counter wins
+34720100% vs other
Installs winner
BitePal: AI Calorie Counter wins
+427052800% vs other
MAU winner
BitePal: AI Calorie Counter wins
+61068550% vs other
Rating winner
BitePal: AI Calorie Counter wins
+452% vs other
Why BitePal: AI Calorie Counter is winning
Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- BitePal: AI Calorie Counter earns roughly 347201× more per month than ahm OSHC - $347.2K vs $0.
- Aggressive pricing. BitePal: AI Calorie Counter undercuts at $8.90/mo vs $13.00/mo - converts a higher % of free users.
- Bigger install base. BitePal: AI Calorie Counter has ~4.3M lifetime installs vs ahm OSHC's ~0 - 4270528.0× the funnel top.
- Better app store reviews. BitePal: AI Calorie Counter sits at 4.52★ vs 0.00★ - store algorithms reward higher-rated apps with more impressions.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full BitePal: AI Calorie Counter report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
ahm OSHC
vs
BitePal: AI Calorie Counter
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$0
▶
$347.2K
Annual revenue (est.)
$0
▶
$4.17M
Lifetime installs (est.)
0
▶
4.3M
Monthly active users (est.)?
0
▶
611K
App Store rating
-
▶
4.52★
Total ratings
0
▶
324K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$13.00
◀
$8.90
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Apr 5, 2019
- Last updated
- Nov 6, 2025
- File size
- 59.8 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 2.8
- Languages
- English, Chinese
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- May 3, 2024
- Last updated
- Jun 26, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 2.20.0
- Languages
- -
ahm OSHC trajectory
BitePal: AI Calorie Counter trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, ahm OSHC or BitePal: AI Calorie Counter? v
BitePal: AI Calorie Counter earns about $347.2K per month, while ahm OSHC earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap (~$347.2K more per month for BitePal: AI Calorie Counter). Annual revenue: ahm OSHC ≈ $0/year, BitePal: AI Calorie Counter ≈ $4.17M/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store / Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, ahm OSHC or BitePal: AI Calorie Counter? v
BitePal: AI Calorie Counter leads with about 4.3M estimated downloads vs 0 for ahm OSHC - a ∞× gap. ahm OSHC's App Store downloads are estimated from 0 ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. BitePal: AI Calorie Counter reports 1,000,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are ahm OSHC and BitePal: AI Calorie Counter in the same App Store category on each store and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do ahm OSHC and BitePal: AI Calorie Counter offer? v
ahm OSHC: no IAP detected on the public listing. BitePal: AI Calorie Counter: IAP range $0.99 - $79.99 per item. ahm OSHC runs a "Subscription (~$13.00/mo, wellness)" monetization model; BitePal: AI Calorie Counter runs "Subscription (~$8.90/mo, fitness-sub)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, ahm OSHC or BitePal: AI Calorie Counter? v
BitePal: AI Calorie Counter edges ahead with a higher overall score (gap of 4.5 stars). Rating volume: ahm OSHC 0 ratings, BitePal: AI Calorie Counter 3K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these ahm OSHC vs BitePal: AI Calorie Counter revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $0 for ahm OSHC and $347.2K for BitePal: AI Calorie Counter are derived from App Store grossing rank / Google Play install ranges, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare ahm OSHC or BitePal: AI Calorie Counter to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store or Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.