ahm OSHC vs Google Fit: Activity Tracking
ahm OSHC
Medibank Private Limited
App Store
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 0 installs
VS
Google Fit: Activity Tracking
Google LLC
Google Play
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 356.3M installs
Revenue winnerTied
Installs winner
Google Fit: Activity Tracking wins
+35632394000% vs other
MAU winner
Google Fit: Activity Tracking wins
+1175869002% vs other
Rating winner
Google Fit: Activity Tracking wins
+345% vs other
Why ahm OSHC is winning
Top 1 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Subscription model. ahm OSHC runs a $13.00/mo subscription that compounds; Google Fit: Activity Tracking relies on one-shot IAP or ads.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full ahm OSHC report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
ahm OSHC
vs
Google Fit: Activity Tracking
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$0
=
$0
Annual revenue (est.)
$0
=
$0
Lifetime installs (est.)
0
▶
356.3M
Monthly active users (est.)?
0
▶
11.8M
App Store rating
-
▶
3.45★
Total ratings
0
▶
682K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$13.00
◀
No sub
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Apr 5, 2019
- Last updated
- Nov 6, 2025
- File size
- 59.8 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 2.8
- Languages
- English, Chinese
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Oct 28, 2014
- Last updated
- Jun 15, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- VARY
- Languages
- -
ahm OSHC trajectory
Google Fit: Activity Tracking trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, ahm OSHC or Google Fit: Activity Tracking? v
Google Fit: Activity Tracking earns about $0 per month, while ahm OSHC earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap. Annual revenue: ahm OSHC ≈ $0/year, Google Fit: Activity Tracking ≈ $0/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store / Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, ahm OSHC or Google Fit: Activity Tracking? v
Google Fit: Activity Tracking leads with about 356.3M estimated downloads vs 0 for ahm OSHC - a ∞× gap. ahm OSHC's App Store downloads are estimated from 0 ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Google Fit: Activity Tracking reports 100,000,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are ahm OSHC and Google Fit: Activity Tracking in the same App Store category on each store and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
Do ahm OSHC and Google Fit: Activity Tracking have in-app purchases? v
ahm OSHC does not appear to offer in-app purchases on its public listing. Google Fit: Activity Tracking does not appear to offer in-app purchases. Monetization model: ahm OSHC runs "Subscription (~$13.00/mo, wellness)", Google Fit: Activity Tracking runs "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)".
Which has better ratings, ahm OSHC or Google Fit: Activity Tracking? v
Google Fit: Activity Tracking edges ahead with a higher overall score (gap of 3.5 stars). Rating volume: ahm OSHC 0 ratings, Google Fit: Activity Tracking 30K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these ahm OSHC vs Google Fit: Activity Tracking revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $0 for ahm OSHC and $0 for Google Fit: Activity Tracking are derived from App Store grossing rank / Google Play install ranges, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare ahm OSHC or Google Fit: Activity Tracking to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store or Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.