AI Calorie Counter: SimpliFit vs Roman: budget weight loss
AI Calorie Counter: SimpliFit
PIXELTIDE LLC
App Store
$85/mo
~$1.0K/yr · 633 installs
VS
Roman: budget weight loss
Roman Kuryanov
App Store
$7/mo
~$81/yr · 650 installs
Revenue winner
AI Calorie Counter: SimpliFit wins
+1114% vs other
Installs winner
Roman: budget weight loss wins
+3% vs other
MAU winner
AI Calorie Counter: SimpliFit wins
+125% vs other
Rating winner
Roman: budget weight loss wins
+20% vs other
Why AI Calorie Counter: SimpliFit is winning
Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- AI Calorie Counter: SimpliFit earns roughly 12× more per month than Roman: budget weight loss - $85 vs $7.
- Subscription model. AI Calorie Counter: SimpliFit runs a $0.99/mo subscription that compounds; Roman: budget weight loss relies on one-shot IAP or ads.
- More monetization surfaces. AI Calorie Counter: SimpliFit runs 8 IAP tiers vs 0 - more chances to convert users at the right price.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full AI Calorie Counter: SimpliFit report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
AI Calorie Counter: SimpliFit
vs
Roman: budget weight loss
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$85
◀
$7
Annual revenue (est.)
$1.0K
◀
$81
Lifetime installs (est.)
633
▶
650
Monthly active users (est.)?
176.607
◀
78.65
App Store rating
4.17★
▶
5.00★
Total ratings
23
◀
13
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$0.99
◀
No sub
IAP tiers detected
8 tiers
◀
0 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Oct 6, 2025
- Last updated
- Jun 26, 2026
- File size
- 123.2 MB
- Content rating
- 12+
- Version
- 1.9.0
- Languages
- Arabic, BN, Bulgarian, Croatian, Czech, English +27 more
- Category
- Food & Drink
- Price
- USD0.39
- Released
- Aug 14, 2018
- Last updated
- Jan 20, 2026
- File size
- 17.5 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 6.0
- Languages
- English, Russian, Chinese, Chinese
AI Calorie Counter: SimpliFit trajectory
Roman: budget weight loss trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, AI Calorie Counter: SimpliFit or Roman: budget weight loss? v
AI Calorie Counter: SimpliFit earns about $85 per month, while Roman: budget weight loss earns about $7. That is a 12.1× revenue gap (~$78 more per month for AI Calorie Counter: SimpliFit). Annual revenue: AI Calorie Counter: SimpliFit ≈ $1.0K/year, Roman: budget weight loss ≈ $81/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, AI Calorie Counter: SimpliFit or Roman: budget weight loss? v
Roman: budget weight loss leads with about 650 estimated downloads vs 633 for AI Calorie Counter: SimpliFit - a 1.0× gap. AI Calorie Counter: SimpliFit's App Store downloads are estimated from 23 ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Roman: budget weight loss's App Store downloads are estimated from 13 ratings.
Are AI Calorie Counter: SimpliFit and Roman: budget weight loss in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
No - AI Calorie Counter: SimpliFit is in Health & Fitness and Roman: budget weight loss is in Food & Drink. They share screen-time attention but earn money in different niches: AI Calorie Counter: SimpliFit from health & fitness monetization patterns, Roman: budget weight loss from food & drink.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do AI Calorie Counter: SimpliFit and Roman: budget weight loss offer? v
AI Calorie Counter: SimpliFit: IAP range 8 tiers detected. Roman: budget weight loss: no IAP detected on the public listing. AI Calorie Counter: SimpliFit runs a "Subscription (~$9.99/mo, fitness-sub)" monetization model; Roman: budget weight loss runs "Paid app ($0.39)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, AI Calorie Counter: SimpliFit or Roman: budget weight loss? v
Roman: budget weight loss edges ahead with ★ 5.0 vs ★ 4.2 (gap of 0.8 stars). Rating volume: AI Calorie Counter: SimpliFit 23 ratings, Roman: budget weight loss 13 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these AI Calorie Counter: SimpliFit vs Roman: budget weight loss revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $85 for AI Calorie Counter: SimpliFit and $7 for Roman: budget weight loss are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness / Food & Drink) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare AI Calorie Counter: SimpliFit or Roman: budget weight loss to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.