AI Calorie Counter: SimpliFit vs Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner
AI Calorie Counter: SimpliFit
PIXELTIDE LLC
App Store
$223/mo
~$2.7K/yr · 633 installs
VS
Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner
Yuka App
Google Play
$1.84M/mo
~$22.07M/yr · 41.7M installs
Revenue winner
Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner wins
+824691% vs other
Installs winner
Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner wins
+6589124% vs other
MAU winner
Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner wins
+1818431% vs other
Rating winner
Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner wins
+13% vs other
Why Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner is winning
Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner earns roughly 8248× more per month than AI Calorie Counter: SimpliFit - $1.84M vs $223.
- Premium pricing. Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner charges $14.14/mo vs AI Calorie Counter: SimpliFit's $12.00/mo - higher ARPU per converted user.
- Bigger install base. Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner has ~41.7M lifetime installs vs AI Calorie Counter: SimpliFit's ~633 - 65892.2× the funnel top.
- Better app store reviews. Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner sits at 4.72★ vs 4.17★ - store algorithms reward higher-rated apps with more impressions.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
AI Calorie Counter: SimpliFit
vs
Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$223
▶
$1.84M
Annual revenue (est.)
$2.7K
▶
$22.07M
Lifetime installs (est.)
633
▶
41.7M
Monthly active users (est.)?
176.607
▶
3.2M
App Store rating
4.17★
▶
4.72★
Total ratings
23
▶
183K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$12.00
▶
$14.14
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Oct 6, 2025
- Last updated
- Jun 26, 2026
- File size
- 123.2 MB
- Content rating
- 12+
- Version
- 1.9.0
- Languages
- Arabic, BN, Bulgarian, Croatian, Czech, English +27 more
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Dec 2, 2019
- Last updated
- Jul 1, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 4.60.1
- Languages
- -
AI Calorie Counter: SimpliFit trajectory
Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, AI Calorie Counter: SimpliFit or Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner? v
Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner earns about $1.84M per month, while AI Calorie Counter: SimpliFit earns about $223. That is a 8247.9× revenue gap (~$1.84M more per month for Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner). Annual revenue: AI Calorie Counter: SimpliFit ≈ $2.7K/year, Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner ≈ $22.07M/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store / Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, AI Calorie Counter: SimpliFit or Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner? v
Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner leads with about 41.7M estimated downloads vs 633 for AI Calorie Counter: SimpliFit - a 65892.2× gap. AI Calorie Counter: SimpliFit's App Store downloads are estimated from 23 ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner reports 10,000,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are AI Calorie Counter: SimpliFit and Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner in the same App Store category on each store and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do AI Calorie Counter: SimpliFit and Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner offer? v
AI Calorie Counter: SimpliFit: no IAP detected on the public listing. Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner: IAP range $10.00 - $20.00 per item. AI Calorie Counter: SimpliFit runs a "Subscription (~$12.00/mo, fitness-sub)" monetization model; Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner runs "Subscription (~$14.14/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, AI Calorie Counter: SimpliFit or Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner? v
Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner edges ahead with ★ 4.7 vs ★ 4.2 (gap of 0.5 stars). Rating volume: AI Calorie Counter: SimpliFit 23 ratings, Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner 10K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these AI Calorie Counter: SimpliFit vs Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $223 for AI Calorie Counter: SimpliFit and $1.84M for Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner are derived from App Store grossing rank / Google Play install ranges, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare AI Calorie Counter: SimpliFit or Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store or Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.