AI Calorie Tracker by Yazio vs Fitbit: Health & Fitness
AI Calorie Tracker by Yazio
YAZIO
App Store
$275.7K/mo
~$3.31M/yr · 1.7M installs
VS
Fitbit: Health & Fitness
Google
App Store
$5.41M/mo
~$64.94M/yr · 98.7M installs
Revenue winner
Fitbit: Health & Fitness wins
+1863% vs other
Installs winner
Fitbit: Health & Fitness wins
+5873% vs other
MAU winner
Fitbit: Health & Fitness wins
+5170% vs other
Rating winner
AI Calorie Tracker by Yazio wins
+4% vs other
Why Fitbit: Health & Fitness is winning
Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Fitbit: Health & Fitness earns roughly 20× more per month than AI Calorie Tracker by Yazio - $5.41M vs $275.7K.
- Aggressive pricing. Fitbit: Health & Fitness undercuts at $9.99/mo vs $11.90/mo - converts a higher % of free users.
- Bigger install base. Fitbit: Health & Fitness has ~98.7M lifetime installs vs AI Calorie Tracker by Yazio's ~1.7M - 59.7× the funnel top.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Fitbit: Health & Fitness report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
AI Calorie Tracker by Yazio
vs
Fitbit: Health & Fitness
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$275.7K
▶
$5.41M
Annual revenue (est.)
$3.31M
▶
$64.94M
Lifetime installs (est.)
1.7M
▶
98.7M
Monthly active users (est.)?
477K
▶
25.2M
App Store rating
4.70★
◀
4.53★
Total ratings
47K
▶
658K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$11.90
◀
$9.99
IAP tiers detected
6 tiers
◀
2 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jan 6, 2015
- Last updated
- May 6, 2026
- File size
- 328.1 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 12.83.1
- Languages
- Czech, Danish, Dutch, English, Finnish, French +14 more
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Oct 18, 2011
- Last updated
- May 7, 2026
- File size
- 450.2 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 4.69
- Languages
- Czech, Danish, Dutch, English, ET, Finnish +22 more
AI Calorie Tracker by Yazio trajectory
Fitbit: Health & Fitness trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, AI Calorie Tracker by Yazio or Fitbit: Health & Fitness? v
Fitbit: Health & Fitness earns about $5.41M per month, while AI Calorie Tracker by Yazio earns about $275.7K. That is a 19.6× revenue gap (~$5.14M more per month for Fitbit: Health & Fitness). Annual revenue: AI Calorie Tracker by Yazio ≈ $3.31M/year, Fitbit: Health & Fitness ≈ $64.94M/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, AI Calorie Tracker by Yazio or Fitbit: Health & Fitness? v
Fitbit: Health & Fitness leads with about 98.7M estimated downloads vs 1.7M for AI Calorie Tracker by Yazio - a 59.7× gap. AI Calorie Tracker by Yazio's App Store downloads are estimated from 47K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Fitbit: Health & Fitness's App Store downloads are estimated from 658K ratings.
Are AI Calorie Tracker by Yazio and Fitbit: Health & Fitness in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do AI Calorie Tracker by Yazio and Fitbit: Health & Fitness offer? v
AI Calorie Tracker by Yazio: IAP range 6 tiers detected. Fitbit: Health & Fitness: IAP range 2 tiers detected. AI Calorie Tracker by Yazio runs a "Subscription (~$11.90/mo, fitness-sub)" monetization model; Fitbit: Health & Fitness runs "Subscription (~$6.67/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, AI Calorie Tracker by Yazio or Fitbit: Health & Fitness? v
AI Calorie Tracker by Yazio edges ahead with ★ 4.7 vs ★ 4.5 (gap of 0.2 stars). Rating volume: AI Calorie Tracker by Yazio 47K ratings, Fitbit: Health & Fitness 658K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these AI Calorie Tracker by Yazio vs Fitbit: Health & Fitness revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $275.7K for AI Calorie Tracker by Yazio and $5.41M for Fitbit: Health & Fitness are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare AI Calorie Tracker by Yazio or Fitbit: Health & Fitness to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.