AI Calorie Tracker by Yazio vs Google Health (Fitbit)
AI Calorie Tracker by Yazio
YAZIO
App Store
$284.6K/mo
~$3.41M/yr · 1.7M installs
VS
Google Health (Fitbit)
Google
App Store
$1.43M/mo
~$17.12M/yr · 101.5M installs
Revenue winner
Google Health (Fitbit) wins
+401% vs other
Installs winner
Google Health (Fitbit) wins
+5853% vs other
MAU winner
Google Health (Fitbit) wins
+1363% vs other
Rating winner
AI Calorie Tracker by Yazio wins
+5% vs other
Why Google Health (Fitbit) is winning
Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Google Health (Fitbit) earns roughly 5× more per month than AI Calorie Tracker by Yazio - $1.43M vs $284.6K.
- Aggressive pricing. Google Health (Fitbit) undercuts at $9.99/mo vs $11.90/mo - converts a higher % of free users.
- Bigger install base. Google Health (Fitbit) has ~101.5M lifetime installs vs AI Calorie Tracker by Yazio's ~1.7M - 59.5× the funnel top.
- Charts placement. Google Health (Fitbit) ranks #91 on the US grossing chart (the other app is unranked) - chart placement is a self-reinforcing flywheel.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Google Health (Fitbit) report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
AI Calorie Tracker by Yazio
vs
Google Health (Fitbit)
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$284.6K
▶
$1.43M
Annual revenue (est.)
$3.41M
▶
$17.12M
Lifetime installs (est.)
1.7M
▶
101.5M
Monthly active users (est.)?
493K
▶
7.2M
App Store rating
4.70★
◀
4.49★
Total ratings
49K
▶
677K
US grossing rank
-
▶
#91
Cheapest monthly sub
$11.90
◀
$9.99
IAP tiers detected
5 tiers
◀
2 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jan 6, 2015
- Last updated
- Jun 30, 2026
- File size
- 348.7 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 26.26.3
- Languages
- Czech, Danish, Dutch, English, Finnish, French +14 more
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Oct 18, 2011
- Last updated
- Jun 23, 2026
- File size
- 548.8 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 5.02.1
- Languages
- Bulgarian, Croatian, Czech, Danish, Dutch, English +26 more
AI Calorie Tracker by Yazio trajectory
Google Health (Fitbit) trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, AI Calorie Tracker by Yazio or Google Health (Fitbit)? v
Google Health (Fitbit) earns about $1.43M per month, while AI Calorie Tracker by Yazio earns about $284.6K. That is a 5.0× revenue gap (~$1.14M more per month for Google Health (Fitbit)). Annual revenue: AI Calorie Tracker by Yazio ≈ $3.41M/year, Google Health (Fitbit) ≈ $17.12M/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, AI Calorie Tracker by Yazio or Google Health (Fitbit)? v
Google Health (Fitbit) leads with about 101.5M estimated downloads vs 1.7M for AI Calorie Tracker by Yazio - a 59.5× gap. AI Calorie Tracker by Yazio's App Store downloads are estimated from 49K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Google Health (Fitbit)'s App Store downloads are estimated from 677K ratings.
Are AI Calorie Tracker by Yazio and Google Health (Fitbit) in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do AI Calorie Tracker by Yazio and Google Health (Fitbit) offer? v
AI Calorie Tracker by Yazio: IAP range 5 tiers detected. Google Health (Fitbit): IAP range 2 tiers detected. AI Calorie Tracker by Yazio runs a "Subscription (~$11.90/mo, fitness-sub)" monetization model; Google Health (Fitbit) runs "Subscription (~$6.67/mo) · calibrated by US grossing rank #91". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, AI Calorie Tracker by Yazio or Google Health (Fitbit)? v
AI Calorie Tracker by Yazio edges ahead with ★ 4.7 vs ★ 4.5 (gap of 0.2 stars). Rating volume: AI Calorie Tracker by Yazio 49K ratings, Google Health (Fitbit) 677K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these AI Calorie Tracker by Yazio vs Google Health (Fitbit) revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $284.6K for AI Calorie Tracker by Yazio and $1.43M for Google Health (Fitbit) are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare AI Calorie Tracker by Yazio or Google Health (Fitbit) to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.