AI Phone:Call&Voice Translator vs No Shorts: Blocker for YouTube
AI Phone:Call&Voice Translator
Second Phone Number Inc
App Store
$469.1K/mo
~$5.63M/yr · 8.2M installs
VS
No Shorts: Blocker for YouTube
Guillaume Claverie
App Store
$48/mo
~$574/yr · 600 installs
Revenue winner
AI Phone:Call&Voice Translator wins
+977194% vs other
Installs winner
AI Phone:Call&Voice Translator wins
+1368080% vs other
MAU winner
AI Phone:Call&Voice Translator wins
+1403772% vs other
Rating winner
AI Phone:Call&Voice Translator wins
+8% vs other
Why AI Phone:Call&Voice Translator is winning
Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- AI Phone:Call&Voice Translator earns roughly 9773× more per month than No Shorts: Blocker for YouTube - $469.1K vs $48.
- Subscription model. AI Phone:Call&Voice Translator runs a $14.99/mo subscription that compounds; No Shorts: Blocker for YouTube relies on one-shot IAP or ads.
- Bigger install base. AI Phone:Call&Voice Translator has ~8.2M lifetime installs vs No Shorts: Blocker for YouTube's ~600 - 13681.8× the funnel top.
- More monetization surfaces. AI Phone:Call&Voice Translator runs 7 IAP tiers vs 0 - more chances to convert users at the right price.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full AI Phone:Call&Voice Translator report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
AI Phone:Call&Voice Translator
vs
No Shorts: Blocker for YouTube
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$469.1K
◀
$48
Annual revenue (est.)
$5.63M
◀
$574
Lifetime installs (est.)
8.2M
◀
600
Monthly active users (est.)?
969K
◀
69
App Store rating
4.68★
◀
4.33★
Total ratings
75K
◀
12
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$14.99
◀
No sub
IAP tiers detected
7 tiers
◀
0 tiers
- Category
- Utilities
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Sep 28, 2023
- Last updated
- Jun 29, 2026
- File size
- 233.4 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 3.39.0
- Languages
- Arabic, English, French, German, Indonesian, Japanese +10 more
- Category
- Utilities
- Price
- USD2.99
- Released
- May 22, 2024
- Last updated
- Apr 22, 2026
- File size
- 0.8 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 1.2.1
- Languages
- English
AI Phone:Call&Voice Translator trajectory
No Shorts: Blocker for YouTube trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, AI Phone:Call&Voice Translator or No Shorts: Blocker for YouTube? v
AI Phone:Call&Voice Translator earns about $469.1K per month, while No Shorts: Blocker for YouTube earns about $48. That is a 9772.9× revenue gap (~$469.1K more per month for AI Phone:Call&Voice Translator). Annual revenue: AI Phone:Call&Voice Translator ≈ $5.63M/year, No Shorts: Blocker for YouTube ≈ $574/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, AI Phone:Call&Voice Translator or No Shorts: Blocker for YouTube? v
AI Phone:Call&Voice Translator leads with about 8.2M estimated downloads vs 600 for No Shorts: Blocker for YouTube - a 13681.8× gap. AI Phone:Call&Voice Translator's App Store downloads are estimated from 75K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. No Shorts: Blocker for YouTube's App Store downloads are estimated from 12 ratings.
Are AI Phone:Call&Voice Translator and No Shorts: Blocker for YouTube in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Utilities category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do AI Phone:Call&Voice Translator and No Shorts: Blocker for YouTube offer? v
AI Phone:Call&Voice Translator: IAP range 7 tiers detected. No Shorts: Blocker for YouTube: no IAP detected on the public listing. AI Phone:Call&Voice Translator runs a "Subscription (~$14.99/mo)" monetization model; No Shorts: Blocker for YouTube runs "Paid app ($2.99)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, AI Phone:Call&Voice Translator or No Shorts: Blocker for YouTube? v
AI Phone:Call&Voice Translator edges ahead with ★ 4.7 vs ★ 4.3 (gap of 0.3 stars). Rating volume: AI Phone:Call&Voice Translator 75K ratings, No Shorts: Blocker for YouTube 12 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these AI Phone:Call&Voice Translator vs No Shorts: Blocker for YouTube revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $469.1K for AI Phone:Call&Voice Translator and $48 for No Shorts: Blocker for YouTube are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Utilities) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare AI Phone:Call&Voice Translator or No Shorts: Blocker for YouTube to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.