Aiko vs Notta Transcribe Voice to Text
Aiko
Sindre Sorhus
App Store
$10.2K/mo
~$122.9K/yr · 16K installs
VS
Notta Transcribe Voice to Text
MindCruiser
App Store
$7.7K/mo
~$92.4K/yr · 105K installs
Revenue winner
Aiko wins
+33% vs other
Installs winner
Notta Transcribe Voice to Text wins
+554% vs other
MAU winner
Notta Transcribe Voice to Text wins
+523% vs other
Rating winner
Aiko wins
+17% vs other
Why Aiko is winning
Top 1 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Better app store reviews. Aiko sits at 4.69★ vs 4.02★ - store algorithms reward higher-rated apps with more impressions.
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Aiko
vs
Notta Transcribe Voice to Text
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$10.2K
◀
$7.7K
Annual revenue (est.)
$122.9K
◀
$92.4K
Lifetime installs (est.)
16K
▶
105K
Monthly active users (est.)?
5K
▶
30K
App Store rating
4.69★
◀
4.02★
Total ratings
320
▶
1K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
▶
$7.99
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
▶
10 tiers
- Category
- Productivity
- Price
- USD24
- Released
- Mar 3, 2023
- Last updated
- Feb 20, 2026
- File size
- 1.69 GB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 1.10.0
- Languages
- English
- Category
- Productivity
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Dec 19, 2019
- Last updated
- Apr 30, 2026
- File size
- 182.8 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 6.71.5
- Languages
- Arabic, Czech, Dutch, English, French, German +15 more
Aiko trajectory
Notta Transcribe Voice to Text trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Aiko or Notta Transcribe Voice to Text? v
Aiko earns about $10.2K per month, while Notta Transcribe Voice to Text earns about $7.7K. That is a 1.3× revenue gap (~$2.5K more per month for Aiko). Annual revenue: Aiko ≈ $122.9K/year, Notta Transcribe Voice to Text ≈ $92.4K/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Aiko or Notta Transcribe Voice to Text? v
Notta Transcribe Voice to Text leads with about 105K estimated downloads vs 16K for Aiko - a 6.5× gap. Aiko's App Store downloads are estimated from 320 ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Notta Transcribe Voice to Text's App Store downloads are estimated from 1K ratings.
Are Aiko and Notta Transcribe Voice to Text in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Productivity category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Aiko and Notta Transcribe Voice to Text offer? v
Aiko: no IAP detected on the public listing. Notta Transcribe Voice to Text: IAP range 10 tiers detected. Aiko runs a "Paid app ($24.00)" monetization model; Notta Transcribe Voice to Text runs "Subscription (~$7.99/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Aiko or Notta Transcribe Voice to Text? v
Aiko edges ahead with ★ 4.7 vs ★ 4.0 (gap of 0.7 stars). Rating volume: Aiko 320 ratings, Notta Transcribe Voice to Text 1K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Aiko vs Notta Transcribe Voice to Text revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $10.2K for Aiko and $7.7K for Notta Transcribe Voice to Text are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Productivity) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Aiko or Notta Transcribe Voice to Text to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.