Airalo: eSIM for travel & data vs Chillon
Airalo: eSIM for travel & data
Airalo
App Store
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 10.7M installs
VS
Chillon
Texetera
App Store
$32/mo
~$383/yr · 400 installs
Revenue winner
Chillon wins
+3200% vs other
Installs winner
Airalo: eSIM for travel & data wins
+2673698% vs other
MAU winner
Airalo: eSIM for travel & data wins
+3217922% vs other
Rating winner
Airalo: eSIM for travel & data wins
+14% vs other
Why Chillon is winning
Top 1 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Chillon earns roughly 32× more per month than Airalo: eSIM for travel & data - $32 vs $0.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Chillon report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
vs
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$0
▶
$32
Annual revenue (est.)
$0
▶
$383
Lifetime installs (est.)
10.7M
◀
400
Monthly active users (est.)?
1.5M
◀
45.2
App Store rating
4.58★
◀
4.00★
Total ratings
97K
◀
1
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
=
No sub
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Travel
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Oct 11, 2019
- Last updated
- Jun 29, 2026
- File size
- 219.9 MB
- Content rating
- 12+
- Version
- 2.20.0
- Languages
- SQ, Arabic, HY, AZ, BS, Bulgarian +43 more
- Category
- Travel
- Price
- USD2.99
- Released
- Jul 12, 2017
- Last updated
- Jul 31, 2020
- File size
- 168.8 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 1.2
- Languages
- English, French, German, Italian, Japanese, Korean +3 more
Airalo: eSIM for travel & data trajectory
Chillon trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Airalo: eSIM for travel & data or Chillon? v
Chillon earns about $32 per month, while Airalo: eSIM for travel & data earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap (~$32 more per month for Chillon). Annual revenue: Airalo: eSIM for travel & data ≈ $0/year, Chillon ≈ $383/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Airalo: eSIM for travel & data or Chillon? v
Airalo: eSIM for travel & data leads with about 10.7M estimated downloads vs 400 for Chillon - a 26738.0× gap. Airalo: eSIM for travel & data's App Store downloads are estimated from 97K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Chillon's App Store downloads are estimated from 1 ratings.
Are Airalo: eSIM for travel & data and Chillon in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Travel category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
Do Airalo: eSIM for travel & data and Chillon have in-app purchases? v
Airalo: eSIM for travel & data does not appear to offer in-app purchases on its public listing. Chillon does not appear to offer in-app purchases. Monetization model: Airalo: eSIM for travel & data runs "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)", Chillon runs "Paid app ($2.99)".
Which has better ratings, Airalo: eSIM for travel & data or Chillon? v
Airalo: eSIM for travel & data edges ahead with ★ 4.6 vs ★ 4.0 (gap of 0.6 stars). Rating volume: Airalo: eSIM for travel & data 97K ratings, Chillon 1 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Airalo: eSIM for travel & data vs Chillon revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $0 for Airalo: eSIM for travel & data and $32 for Chillon are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Travel) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Airalo: eSIM for travel & data or Chillon to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.
