AirMirror: AirPlay Receiver vs Flud+
AirMirror: AirPlay Receiver
NeoYantra
Google Play
$3.0K/mo
~$35.5K/yr · 49K installs
VS
Flud+
Delphi softwares
Google Play
$8.6K/mo
~$103.7K/yr · 181K installs
Revenue winner
Flud+ wins
+192% vs other
Installs winner
Flud+ wins
+266% vs other
MAU winner
Flud+ wins
+254% vs other
Rating winner
Flud+ wins
+32% vs other
Why Flud+ is winning
Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Flud+ earns roughly 3× more per month than AirMirror: AirPlay Receiver - $8.6K vs $3.0K.
- Bigger install base. Flud+ has ~181K lifetime installs vs AirMirror: AirPlay Receiver's ~49K - 3.7× the funnel top.
- Better app store reviews. Flud+ sits at 4.74★ vs 3.59★ - store algorithms reward higher-rated apps with more impressions.
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
vs
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$3.0K
▶
$8.6K
Annual revenue (est.)
$35.5K
▶
$103.7K
Lifetime installs (est.)
49K
▶
181K
Monthly active users (est.)?
5K
▶
16K
App Store rating
3.59★
▶
4.74★
Total ratings
310
▶
17K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
=
No sub
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Video Players & Editors
- Price
- USD4.99
- Released
- Feb 14, 2017
- Last updated
- Jul 5, 2024
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 2.4
- Languages
- -
- Category
- Video Players & Editors
- Price
- USD3.99
- Released
- May 10, 2014
- Last updated
- May 9, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- VARY
- Languages
- -
AirMirror: AirPlay Receiver trajectory
Flud+ trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, AirMirror: AirPlay Receiver or Flud+? v
Flud+ earns about $8.6K per month, while AirMirror: AirPlay Receiver earns about $3.0K. That is a 2.9× revenue gap (~$5.7K more per month for Flud+). Annual revenue: AirMirror: AirPlay Receiver ≈ $35.5K/year, Flud+ ≈ $103.7K/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, AirMirror: AirPlay Receiver or Flud+? v
Flud+ leads with about 181K estimated downloads vs 49K for AirMirror: AirPlay Receiver - a 3.7× gap. AirMirror: AirPlay Receiver reports 10,000+ installs on Google Play. Flud+ reports 100,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are AirMirror: AirPlay Receiver and Flud+ in the same Google Play category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Video Players & Editors category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
Do AirMirror: AirPlay Receiver and Flud+ have in-app purchases? v
AirMirror: AirPlay Receiver does not appear to offer in-app purchases on its public listing. Flud+ does not appear to offer in-app purchases. Monetization model: AirMirror: AirPlay Receiver runs "Paid app ($4.99)", Flud+ runs "Paid app ($3.99)".
Which has better ratings, AirMirror: AirPlay Receiver or Flud+? v
Flud+ edges ahead with ★ 4.7 vs ★ 3.6 (gap of 1.1 stars). Rating volume: AirMirror: AirPlay Receiver 21 ratings, Flud+ 1K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these AirMirror: AirPlay Receiver vs Flud+ revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $3.0K for AirMirror: AirPlay Receiver and $8.6K for Flud+ are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Video Players & Editors) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare AirMirror: AirPlay Receiver or Flud+ to a different Google Play app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.
