Alfred Camera: Home Security vs Pixel Pro 2 - Watch face

Alfred Camera: Home Security

Alfred Systems Inc.
App Store
$374.9K/mo
~$4.50M/yr · 16.3M installs
VS

Pixel Pro 2 - Watch face

SP Watches
Google Play
$127/mo
~$1.5K/yr · 11K installs
Revenue winner Alfred Camera: Home Security wins +295128% vs other
Installs winner Alfred Camera: Home Security wins +152304% vs other
MAU winner Alfred Camera: Home Security wins +160397% vs other
Rating winner Alfred Camera: Home Security wins +16% vs other

Why Alfred Camera: Home Security is winning

Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.

  1. Alfred Camera: Home Security earns roughly 2952× more per month than Pixel Pro 2 - Watch face - $374.9K vs $127.
  2. Subscription model. Alfred Camera: Home Security runs a $4.99/mo subscription that compounds; Pixel Pro 2 - Watch face relies on one-shot IAP or ads.
  3. Bigger install base. Alfred Camera: Home Security has ~16.3M lifetime installs vs Pixel Pro 2 - Watch face's ~11K - 1524.0× the funnel top.
  4. More monetization surfaces. Alfred Camera: Home Security runs 6 IAP tiers vs 0 - more chances to convert users at the right price.

→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Alfred Camera: Home Security report

Side-by-side metrics

Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.

Alfred Camera: Home Security
vs
Pixel Pro 2 - Watch face
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$374.9K
◀
$127
Annual revenue (est.)
$4.50M
◀
$1.5K
Lifetime installs (est.)
16.3M
◀
11K
Monthly active users (est.)?
1.9M
◀
1K
App Store rating
4.77★
◀
4.13★
Total ratings
109K
◀
83
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$4.99
◀
No sub
IAP tiers detected
6 tiers
◀
0 tiers

Alfred Camera: Home Security

Alfred Systems Inc.
App Store
Category
Lifestyle
Price
Free
Released
May 2, 2015
Last updated
May 7, 2026
File size
201.3 MB
Content rating
4+
Version
2026.10.0
Languages
Arabic, English, French, German, Indonesian, Italian +9 more
View full Alfred Camera: Home Security report →

Pixel Pro 2 - Watch face

SP Watches
Google Play
Category
Lifestyle
Price
USD0.99
Released
May 20, 2024
Last updated
Sep 4, 2025
File size
-
Content rating
Everyone
Version
VARY
Languages
-
View full Pixel Pro 2 - Watch face report →

Alfred Camera: Home Security trajectory

JunJulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMay

Pixel Pro 2 - Watch face trajectory

JunJulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMay

Related app pages

Alfred Camera: Home Security App Store page →Pixel Pro 2 - Watch face Play Store page →

Related comparisons

Alfred Camera Home Security iOS vs Tinder Dating App Date Chat iOSAlfred Camera Home Security iOS vs Baby Led Weaning Recipes iOSAlfred Camera Home Security iOS vs Life360 Stay Connected Safe AndroidAlfred Camera Home Security iOS vs Wyze Never Wonder AndroidAlfred Camera Home Security iOS vs Design Space Diy With Cricut AndroidAlfred Camera Home Security iOS vs Transcend Theory Android

Compare another pair

FAQ

Which makes more money, Alfred Camera: Home Security or Pixel Pro 2 - Watch face? v
Alfred Camera: Home Security earns about $374.9K per month, while Pixel Pro 2 - Watch face earns about $127. That is a 2952.3× revenue gap (~$374.8K more per month for Alfred Camera: Home Security). Annual revenue: Alfred Camera: Home Security ≈ $4.50M/year, Pixel Pro 2 - Watch face ≈ $1.5K/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store / Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Alfred Camera: Home Security or Pixel Pro 2 - Watch face? v
Alfred Camera: Home Security leads with about 16.3M estimated downloads vs 11K for Pixel Pro 2 - Watch face - a 1524.0× gap. Alfred Camera: Home Security's App Store downloads are estimated from 109K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Pixel Pro 2 - Watch face reports 10,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Alfred Camera: Home Security and Pixel Pro 2 - Watch face in the same App Store category on each store and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Lifestyle category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Alfred Camera: Home Security and Pixel Pro 2 - Watch face offer? v
Alfred Camera: Home Security: IAP range 6 tiers detected. Pixel Pro 2 - Watch face: no IAP detected on the public listing. Alfred Camera: Home Security runs a "Subscription (~$5.99/mo)" monetization model; Pixel Pro 2 - Watch face runs "Paid app ($0.99)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Alfred Camera: Home Security or Pixel Pro 2 - Watch face? v
Alfred Camera: Home Security edges ahead with ★ 4.8 vs ★ 4.1 (gap of 0.6 stars). Rating volume: Alfred Camera: Home Security 109K ratings, Pixel Pro 2 - Watch face 1 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Alfred Camera: Home Security vs Pixel Pro 2 - Watch face revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $374.9K for Alfred Camera: Home Security and $127 for Pixel Pro 2 - Watch face are derived from App Store grossing rank / Google Play install ranges, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Lifestyle) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Alfred Camera: Home Security or Pixel Pro 2 - Watch face to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store or Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.