Allergy & Food Scanner: Ryla vs Too Good To Go: End Food Waste
Allergy & Food Scanner: Ryla
Anmol Rattan
App Store
$212/mo
~$2.5K/yr · 2K installs
VS
Too Good To Go: End Food Waste
Too Good To Go
App Store
$5.73M/mo
~$68.75M/yr · 75.2M installs
Revenue winner
Too Good To Go: End Food Waste wins
+2702494% vs other
Installs winner
Too Good To Go: End Food Waste wins
+4022812% vs other
MAU winner
Too Good To Go: End Food Waste wins
+3472670% vs other
Rating winner
Too Good To Go: End Food Waste wins
+9% vs other
Why Too Good To Go: End Food Waste is winning
Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Too Good To Go: End Food Waste earns roughly 27026× more per month than Allergy & Food Scanner: Ryla - $5.73M vs $212.
- Aggressive pricing. Too Good To Go: End Food Waste undercuts at $10.00/mo vs $29.99/mo - converts a higher % of free users.
- Bigger install base. Too Good To Go: End Food Waste has ~75.2M lifetime installs vs Allergy & Food Scanner: Ryla's ~2K - 40229.1× the funnel top.
- Better app store reviews. Too Good To Go: End Food Waste sits at 4.93★ vs 4.53★ - store algorithms reward higher-rated apps with more impressions.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Too Good To Go: End Food Waste report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
vs
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$212
▶
$5.73M
Annual revenue (est.)
$2.5K
▶
$68.75M
Lifetime installs (est.)
2K
▶
75.2M
Monthly active users (est.)?
218.79
▶
7.6M
App Store rating
4.53★
▶
4.93★
Total ratings
34
▶
502K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$29.99
◀
$10.00
IAP tiers detected
4 tiers
◀
0 tiers
- Category
- Food & Drink
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Aug 14, 2025
- Last updated
- Apr 4, 2026
- File size
- 29.8 MB
- Content rating
- 12+
- Version
- 1.1.3
- Languages
- English
- Category
- Food & Drink
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Dec 8, 2015
- Last updated
- May 5, 2026
- File size
- 141.6 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 26.5.0
- Languages
- EU, Catalan, Czech, Danish, Dutch, English +10 more
Allergy & Food Scanner: Ryla trajectory
Too Good To Go: End Food Waste trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Allergy & Food Scanner: Ryla or Too Good To Go: End Food Waste? v
Too Good To Go: End Food Waste earns about $5.73M per month, while Allergy & Food Scanner: Ryla earns about $212. That is a 27025.9× revenue gap (~$5.73M more per month for Too Good To Go: End Food Waste). Annual revenue: Allergy & Food Scanner: Ryla ≈ $2.5K/year, Too Good To Go: End Food Waste ≈ $68.75M/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Allergy & Food Scanner: Ryla or Too Good To Go: End Food Waste? v
Too Good To Go: End Food Waste leads with about 75.2M estimated downloads vs 2K for Allergy & Food Scanner: Ryla - a 40229.1× gap. Allergy & Food Scanner: Ryla's App Store downloads are estimated from 34 ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Too Good To Go: End Food Waste's App Store downloads are estimated from 502K ratings.
Are Allergy & Food Scanner: Ryla and Too Good To Go: End Food Waste in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Food & Drink category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Allergy & Food Scanner: Ryla and Too Good To Go: End Food Waste offer? v
Allergy & Food Scanner: Ryla: IAP range 4 tiers detected. Too Good To Go: End Food Waste: no IAP detected on the public listing. Allergy & Food Scanner: Ryla runs a "Subscription (~$29.99/mo)" monetization model; Too Good To Go: End Food Waste runs "Subscription (~$10.00/mo, security)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Allergy & Food Scanner: Ryla or Too Good To Go: End Food Waste? v
Too Good To Go: End Food Waste edges ahead with ★ 4.9 vs ★ 4.5 (gap of 0.4 stars). Rating volume: Allergy & Food Scanner: Ryla 34 ratings, Too Good To Go: End Food Waste 502K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Allergy & Food Scanner: Ryla vs Too Good To Go: End Food Waste revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $212 for Allergy & Food Scanner: Ryla and $5.73M for Too Good To Go: End Food Waste are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Food & Drink) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Allergy & Food Scanner: Ryla or Too Good To Go: End Food Waste to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.
