Amazon Photos: Photo & Video vs Time Warp Scan Cam&Face Filter
Amazon Photos: Photo & Video
Amazon Mobile LLC
Google Play
$3.32M/mo
~$39.86M/yr · 88.9M installs
VS
Time Warp Scan Cam&Face Filter
HDY Studio
Google Play
$1.23M/mo
~$14.76M/yr · 24.3M installs
Revenue winner
Amazon Photos: Photo & Video wins
+170% vs other
Installs winner
Amazon Photos: Photo & Video wins
+266% vs other
MAU winner
Amazon Photos: Photo & Video wins
+274% vs other
Rating winner
Amazon Photos: Photo & Video wins
+6% vs other
Why Amazon Photos: Photo & Video is winning
Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Amazon Photos: Photo & Video earns roughly 3× more per month than Time Warp Scan Cam&Face Filter - $3.32M vs $1.23M.
- Aggressive pricing. Amazon Photos: Photo & Video undercuts at $3.45/mo vs $34.63/mo - converts a higher % of free users.
- Bigger install base. Amazon Photos: Photo & Video has ~88.9M lifetime installs vs Time Warp Scan Cam&Face Filter's ~24.3M - 3.7× the funnel top.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Amazon Photos: Photo & Video report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
vs
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$3.32M
◀
$1.23M
Annual revenue (est.)
$39.86M
◀
$14.76M
Lifetime installs (est.)
88.9M
◀
24.3M
Monthly active users (est.)?
8.4M
◀
2.3M
App Store rating
4.71★
◀
4.46★
Total ratings
1.1M
◀
20K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$3.45
▶
$34.63
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Photography
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Nov 2, 2012
- Last updated
- Apr 28, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- VARY
- Languages
- -
- Category
- Photography
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Oct 8, 2022
- Last updated
- May 9, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 2.1.1
- Languages
- -
Amazon Photos: Photo & Video trajectory
Time Warp Scan Cam&Face Filter trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Amazon Photos: Photo & Video or Time Warp Scan Cam&Face Filter? v
Amazon Photos: Photo & Video earns about $3.32M per month, while Time Warp Scan Cam&Face Filter earns about $1.23M. That is a 2.7× revenue gap (~$2.09M more per month for Amazon Photos: Photo & Video). Annual revenue: Amazon Photos: Photo & Video ≈ $39.86M/year, Time Warp Scan Cam&Face Filter ≈ $14.76M/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Amazon Photos: Photo & Video or Time Warp Scan Cam&Face Filter? v
Amazon Photos: Photo & Video leads with about 88.9M estimated downloads vs 24.3M for Time Warp Scan Cam&Face Filter - a 3.7× gap. Amazon Photos: Photo & Video reports 50,000,000+ installs on Google Play. Time Warp Scan Cam&Face Filter reports 10,000,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Amazon Photos: Photo & Video and Time Warp Scan Cam&Face Filter in the same Google Play category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Photography category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Amazon Photos: Photo & Video and Time Warp Scan Cam&Face Filter offer? v
Amazon Photos: Photo & Video: IAP range $0.99 - $11.99 per item. Time Warp Scan Cam&Face Filter: IAP range $19.99 - $59.99 per item. Amazon Photos: Photo & Video runs a "Subscription (~$3.45/mo)" monetization model; Time Warp Scan Cam&Face Filter runs "Subscription (~$34.63/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Amazon Photos: Photo & Video or Time Warp Scan Cam&Face Filter? v
Amazon Photos: Photo & Video edges ahead with ★ 4.7 vs ★ 4.5 (gap of 0.3 stars). Rating volume: Amazon Photos: Photo & Video 132K ratings, Time Warp Scan Cam&Face Filter 417 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Amazon Photos: Photo & Video vs Time Warp Scan Cam&Face Filter revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $3.32M for Amazon Photos: Photo & Video and $1.23M for Time Warp Scan Cam&Face Filter are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Photography) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Amazon Photos: Photo & Video or Time Warp Scan Cam&Face Filter to a different Google Play app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.
