Amazon Photos: Photo & Video vs TON: Filters for Video & Photo
Amazon Photos: Photo & Video
Amazon Mobile LLC
Google Play
$3.32M/mo
~$39.88M/yr · 88.9M installs
VS
TON: Filters for Video & Photo
Mobile Presets & Filters
Google Play
$189.4K/mo
~$2.27M/yr · 3.1M installs
Revenue winner
Amazon Photos: Photo & Video wins
+1654% vs other
Installs winner
Amazon Photos: Photo & Video wins
+2764% vs other
MAU winner
Amazon Photos: Photo & Video wins
+1655% vs other
Rating winner
Amazon Photos: Photo & Video wins
+7% vs other
Why Amazon Photos: Photo & Video is winning
Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Amazon Photos: Photo & Video earns roughly 18× more per month than TON: Filters for Video & Photo - $3.32M vs $189.4K.
- Aggressive pricing. Amazon Photos: Photo & Video undercuts at $3.45/mo vs $14.48/mo - converts a higher % of free users.
- Bigger install base. Amazon Photos: Photo & Video has ~88.9M lifetime installs vs TON: Filters for Video & Photo's ~3.1M - 28.6× the funnel top.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Amazon Photos: Photo & Video report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Amazon Photos: Photo & Video
vs
TON: Filters for Video & Photo
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$3.32M
◀
$189.4K
Annual revenue (est.)
$39.88M
◀
$2.27M
Lifetime installs (est.)
88.9M
◀
3.1M
Monthly active users (est.)?
8.4M
◀
481K
App Store rating
4.71★
◀
4.42★
Total ratings
1.1M
◀
19K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$3.45
▶
$14.48
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Photography
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Nov 2, 2012
- Last updated
- Apr 28, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- VARY
- Languages
- -
- Category
- Photography
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jun 7, 2022
- Last updated
- Oct 28, 2025
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 1.5.1
- Languages
- -
Amazon Photos: Photo & Video trajectory
TON: Filters for Video & Photo trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Amazon Photos: Photo & Video or TON: Filters for Video & Photo? v
Amazon Photos: Photo & Video earns about $3.32M per month, while TON: Filters for Video & Photo earns about $189.4K. That is a 17.5× revenue gap (~$3.13M more per month for Amazon Photos: Photo & Video). Annual revenue: Amazon Photos: Photo & Video ≈ $39.88M/year, TON: Filters for Video & Photo ≈ $2.27M/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Amazon Photos: Photo & Video or TON: Filters for Video & Photo? v
Amazon Photos: Photo & Video leads with about 88.9M estimated downloads vs 3.1M for TON: Filters for Video & Photo - a 28.6× gap. Amazon Photos: Photo & Video reports 50,000,000+ installs on Google Play. TON: Filters for Video & Photo reports 1,000,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Amazon Photos: Photo & Video and TON: Filters for Video & Photo in the same Google Play category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Photography category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Amazon Photos: Photo & Video and TON: Filters for Video & Photo offer? v
Amazon Photos: Photo & Video: IAP range $0.99 - $11.99 per item. TON: Filters for Video & Photo: IAP range $6.99 - $29.99 per item. Amazon Photos: Photo & Video runs a "Subscription (~$3.45/mo)" monetization model; TON: Filters for Video & Photo runs "Subscription (~$14.48/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Amazon Photos: Photo & Video or TON: Filters for Video & Photo? v
Amazon Photos: Photo & Video edges ahead with ★ 4.7 vs ★ 4.4 (gap of 0.3 stars). Rating volume: Amazon Photos: Photo & Video 132K ratings, TON: Filters for Video & Photo 71 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Amazon Photos: Photo & Video vs TON: Filters for Video & Photo revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $3.32M for Amazon Photos: Photo & Video and $189.4K for TON: Filters for Video & Photo are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Photography) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Amazon Photos: Photo & Video or TON: Filters for Video & Photo to a different Google Play app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.