Among Us vs Clay Jam Classic
Among Us
Innersloth LLC
Google Play
$1.30M/mo
~$15.65M/yr · 774.1M installs
VS
Clay Jam Classic
YumYumYukYuk
Google Play
$71/mo
~$854/yr · 2K installs
Revenue winner
Among Us wins
+1837204% vs other
Installs winner
Among Us wins
+39015959% vs other
MAU winner
Among Us wins
+5202041% vs other
Rating winner
Clay Jam Classic wins
+27% vs other
Why Among Us is winning
Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Among Us earns roughly 18373× more per month than Clay Jam Classic - $1.30M vs $71.
- Subscription model. Among Us runs a $4.97/mo subscription that compounds; Clay Jam Classic relies on one-shot IAP or ads.
- Bigger install base. Among Us has ~774.1M lifetime installs vs Clay Jam Classic's ~2K - 390160.6× the funnel top.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Among Us report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Among Us
vs
Clay Jam Classic
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$1.30M
◀
$71
Annual revenue (est.)
$15.65M
◀
$854
Lifetime installs (est.)
774.1M
◀
2K
Monthly active users (est.)?
12.4M
◀
238.08
App Store rating
3.91★
▶
4.95★
Total ratings
13.6M
◀
202
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$4.97
◀
No sub
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Action
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jun 15, 2018
- Last updated
- Apr 2, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone 10+
- Version
- 2026.4.7
- Languages
- -
- Category
- Action
- Price
- USD2.99
- Released
- Mar 27, 2026
- Last updated
- Apr 1, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 1.4
- Languages
- -
Among Us trajectory
Clay Jam Classic trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Among Us or Clay Jam Classic? v
Among Us earns about $1.30M per month, while Clay Jam Classic earns about $71. That is a 18373.0× revenue gap (~$1.30M more per month for Among Us). Annual revenue: Among Us ≈ $15.65M/year, Clay Jam Classic ≈ $854/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Among Us or Clay Jam Classic? v
Among Us leads with about 774.1M estimated downloads vs 2K for Clay Jam Classic - a 390160.6× gap. Among Us reports 500,000,000+ installs on Google Play. Clay Jam Classic reports 1,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Among Us and Clay Jam Classic in the same Google Play category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Action category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Among Us and Clay Jam Classic offer? v
Among Us: IAP range $0.99 - $24.99 per item. Clay Jam Classic: no IAP detected on the public listing. Among Us runs a "Free game · IAP-driven (0 packs, ~$0.30/MAU)" monetization model; Clay Jam Classic runs "Paid app ($2.99)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Among Us or Clay Jam Classic? v
Clay Jam Classic edges ahead with ★ 5.0 vs ★ 3.9 (gap of 1.0 stars). Rating volume: Among Us 528K ratings, Clay Jam Classic 47 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Among Us vs Clay Jam Classic revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $1.30M for Among Us and $71 for Clay Jam Classic are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Action) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Among Us or Clay Jam Classic to a different Google Play app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.