ANA vs Polarsteps
ANA
ANA (All Nippon Airways)
App Store
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 648K installs
VS
Polarsteps
Polarsteps B.V.
App Store
$40.8K/mo
~$489.6K/yr · 684K installs
Revenue winner
Polarsteps wins
+4079800% vs other
Installs winner
Polarsteps wins
+6% vs other
MAU winner
Polarsteps wins
+7% vs other
Rating winner
Polarsteps wins
+5% vs other
Why Polarsteps is winning
Top 2 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Polarsteps earns roughly 40798× more per month than ANA - $40.8K vs $0.
- Subscription model. Polarsteps runs a $9.99/mo subscription that compounds; ANA relies on one-shot IAP or ads.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Polarsteps report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
ANA
vs
Polarsteps
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$0
▶
$40.8K
Annual revenue (est.)
$0
▶
$489.6K
Lifetime installs (est.)
648K
▶
684K
Monthly active users (est.)?
118K
▶
127K
App Store rating
4.66★
▶
4.88★
Total ratings
8K
▶
9K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
▶
$9.99
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
▶
1 tiers
- Category
- Travel
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jul 26, 2010
- Last updated
- Jul 1, 2026
- File size
- 113.5 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 7.1.0
- Languages
- English, Japanese
- Category
- Travel
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Mar 23, 2015
- Last updated
- Jul 2, 2026
- File size
- 193.0 MB
- Content rating
- 12+
- Version
- 10.0.1
- Languages
- Danish, Dutch, English, Finnish, French, German +7 more
ANA trajectory
Polarsteps trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, ANA or Polarsteps? v
Polarsteps earns about $40.8K per month, while ANA earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap (~$40.8K more per month for Polarsteps). Annual revenue: ANA ≈ $0/year, Polarsteps ≈ $489.6K/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, ANA or Polarsteps? v
Polarsteps leads with about 684K estimated downloads vs 648K for ANA - a 1.1× gap. ANA's App Store downloads are estimated from 8K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Polarsteps's App Store downloads are estimated from 9K ratings.
Are ANA and Polarsteps in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Travel category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do ANA and Polarsteps offer? v
ANA: no IAP detected on the public listing. Polarsteps: IAP range 1 tiers detected. ANA runs a "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)" monetization model; Polarsteps runs "Subscription (~$9.99/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, ANA or Polarsteps? v
Polarsteps edges ahead with ★ 4.9 vs ★ 4.7 (gap of 0.2 stars). Rating volume: ANA 8K ratings, Polarsteps 9K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these ANA vs Polarsteps revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $0 for ANA and $40.8K for Polarsteps are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Travel) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare ANA or Polarsteps to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.