Analog, by NOSSAFLEX vs PhotoPills
Analog, by NOSSAFLEX
Diego Bustamante
App Store
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 550 installs
VS
PhotoPills
PhotoPills S.L.
App Store
$35.1K/mo
~$420.6K/yr · 120K installs
Revenue winner
PhotoPills wins
+3505100% vs other
Installs winner
PhotoPills wins
+21645% vs other
MAU winner
PhotoPills wins
+21645% vs other
Rating winner
Analog, by NOSSAFLEX wins
+1% vs other
Why PhotoPills is winning
Top 2 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- PhotoPills earns roughly 35051× more per month than Analog, by NOSSAFLEX - $35.1K vs $0.
- Bigger install base. PhotoPills has ~120K lifetime installs vs Analog, by NOSSAFLEX's ~550 - 217.5× the funnel top.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full PhotoPills report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Analog, by NOSSAFLEX
vs
PhotoPills
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$0
▶
$35.1K
Annual revenue (est.)
$0
▶
$420.6K
Lifetime installs (est.)
550
▶
120K
Monthly active users (est.)?
173.8
▶
38K
App Store rating
4.73★
◀
4.70★
Total ratings
11
▶
1K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
=
No sub
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Photo & Video
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Feb 9, 2021
- Last updated
- Oct 10, 2025
- File size
- 44.6 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 2.51
- Languages
- English
- Category
- Photo & Video
- Price
- USD10.99
- Released
- Mar 21, 2013
- Last updated
- Apr 16, 2026
- File size
- 51.0 MB
- Content rating
- 17+
- Version
- 2.13.25
- Languages
- Catalan, English, French, German, Italian, Japanese +3 more
Analog, by NOSSAFLEX trajectory
PhotoPills trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Analog, by NOSSAFLEX or PhotoPills? v
PhotoPills earns about $35.1K per month, while Analog, by NOSSAFLEX earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap (~$35.1K more per month for PhotoPills). Annual revenue: Analog, by NOSSAFLEX ≈ $0/year, PhotoPills ≈ $420.6K/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Analog, by NOSSAFLEX or PhotoPills? v
PhotoPills leads with about 120K estimated downloads vs 550 for Analog, by NOSSAFLEX - a 217.5× gap. Analog, by NOSSAFLEX's App Store downloads are estimated from 11 ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. PhotoPills's App Store downloads are estimated from 1K ratings.
Are Analog, by NOSSAFLEX and PhotoPills in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Photo & Video category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
Do Analog, by NOSSAFLEX and PhotoPills have in-app purchases? v
Analog, by NOSSAFLEX does not appear to offer in-app purchases on its public listing. PhotoPills does not appear to offer in-app purchases. Monetization model: Analog, by NOSSAFLEX runs "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)", PhotoPills runs "Paid app ($10.99)".
Which has better ratings, Analog, by NOSSAFLEX or PhotoPills? v
Analog, by NOSSAFLEX edges ahead with ★ 4.7 vs ★ 4.7 (gap of 0.0 stars). Rating volume: Analog, by NOSSAFLEX 11 ratings, PhotoPills 1K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Analog, by NOSSAFLEX vs PhotoPills revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $0 for Analog, by NOSSAFLEX and $35.1K for PhotoPills are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Photo & Video) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Analog, by NOSSAFLEX or PhotoPills to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.