Analog Sport Watch Face vs TMF16
Analog Sport Watch Face
Comback Watch Faces
Google Play
$17/mo
~$200/yr · 1K installs
VS
TMF16
Timefy™
Google Play
$100/mo
~$1.2K/yr · 4K installs
Revenue winner
TMF16 wins
+488% vs other
Installs winner
TMF16 wins
+199% vs other
MAU winner
TMF16 wins
+207% vs other
Rating winner
TMF16 wins
+436% vs other
Why TMF16 is winning
Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- TMF16 earns roughly 6× more per month than Analog Sport Watch Face - $100 vs $17.
- Bigger install base. TMF16 has ~4K lifetime installs vs Analog Sport Watch Face's ~1K - 3.0× the funnel top.
- Better app store reviews. TMF16 sits at 4.36★ vs 0.00★ - store algorithms reward higher-rated apps with more impressions.
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Analog Sport Watch Face
vs
TMF16
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$17
▶
$100
Annual revenue (est.)
$200
▶
$1.2K
Lifetime installs (est.)
1K
▶
4K
Monthly active users (est.)?
157.136
▶
482.31
App Store rating
-
▶
4.36★
Total ratings
0
▶
145
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
=
No sub
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Personalization
- Price
- USD0.99
- Released
- Mar 5, 2026
- Last updated
- Mar 6, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- VARY
- Languages
- -
- Category
- Personalization
- Price
- USD1.99
- Released
- Dec 26, 2023
- Last updated
- Jul 23, 2025
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- VARY
- Languages
- -
Analog Sport Watch Face trajectory
TMF16 trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Analog Sport Watch Face or TMF16? v
TMF16 earns about $100 per month, while Analog Sport Watch Face earns about $17. That is a 5.9× revenue gap (~$83 more per month for TMF16). Annual revenue: Analog Sport Watch Face ≈ $200/year, TMF16 ≈ $1.2K/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Analog Sport Watch Face or TMF16? v
TMF16 leads with about 4K estimated downloads vs 1K for Analog Sport Watch Face - a 3.0× gap. Analog Sport Watch Face reports 1,000+ installs on Google Play. TMF16 reports 1,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Analog Sport Watch Face and TMF16 in the same Google Play category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Personalization category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
Do Analog Sport Watch Face and TMF16 have in-app purchases? v
Analog Sport Watch Face does not appear to offer in-app purchases on its public listing. TMF16 does not appear to offer in-app purchases. Monetization model: Analog Sport Watch Face runs "Paid app ($0.99)", TMF16 runs "Paid app ($1.99)".
Which has better ratings, Analog Sport Watch Face or TMF16? v
TMF16 edges ahead with a higher overall score (gap of 4.4 stars). Rating volume: Analog Sport Watch Face 0 ratings, TMF16 7 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Analog Sport Watch Face vs TMF16 revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $17 for Analog Sport Watch Face and $100 for TMF16 are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Personalization) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Analog Sport Watch Face or TMF16 to a different Google Play app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.