Android Widgets (Material U) vs WTW M18 Sport Watch Face

Android Widgets (Material U)

Dita Cristian Ionut
Google Play
$1.4K/mo
~$16.4K/yr · 280K installs
VS

WTW M18 Sport Watch Face

WTW Design
Google Play
$34/mo
~$412/yr · 1K installs
Revenue winner Android Widgets (Material U) wins +3929% vs other
Installs winner Android Widgets (Material U) wins +22352% vs other
MAU winner Android Widgets (Material U) wins +17140% vs other
Rating winner Android Widgets (Material U) wins +427% vs other

Why Android Widgets (Material U) is winning

Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.

  1. Android Widgets (Material U) earns roughly 40× more per month than WTW M18 Sport Watch Face - $1.4K vs $34.
  2. Subscription model. Android Widgets (Material U) runs a $1.40/mo subscription that compounds; WTW M18 Sport Watch Face relies on one-shot IAP or ads.
  3. Bigger install base. Android Widgets (Material U) has ~280K lifetime installs vs WTW M18 Sport Watch Face's ~1K - 224.5× the funnel top.
  4. Better app store reviews. Android Widgets (Material U) sits at 4.27★ vs 0.00★ - store algorithms reward higher-rated apps with more impressions.

→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Android Widgets (Material U) report

Side-by-side metrics

Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.

Android Widgets (Material U)
vs
WTW M18 Sport Watch Face
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$1.4K
◀
$34
Annual revenue (est.)
$16.4K
◀
$412
Lifetime installs (est.)
280K
◀
1K
Monthly active users (est.)?
24K
◀
139.776
App Store rating
4.27★
◀
-
Total ratings
3K
◀
0
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$1.40
◀
No sub
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers

Android Widgets (Material U)

Dita Cristian Ionut
Google Play
Category
Personalization
Price
Free
Released
Oct 19, 2021
Last updated
Oct 6, 2025
File size
-
Content rating
Everyone
Version
3.3.0
Languages
-
View full Android Widgets (Material U) report →

WTW M18 Sport Watch Face

WTW Design
Google Play
Category
Personalization
Price
USD2.29
Released
Dec 10, 2025
Last updated
Jan 23, 2026
File size
-
Content rating
Everyone
Version
VARY
Languages
-
View full WTW M18 Sport Watch Face report →

Android Widgets (Material U) trajectory

JunJulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMay

WTW M18 Sport Watch Face trajectory

JunJulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMay

Related app pages

Android Widgets (Material U) Play Store page →WTW M18 Sport Watch Face Play Store page →

Related comparisons

Android Widgets Material U Android vs Moonlit Walls AndroidAndroid Widgets Material U Android vs Pixel 4 S Rush Hour Watch Face AndroidAce of Horizons Watch Face Android vs Android Widgets Material U AndroidAndroid Widgets Material U Android vs Chronograph Hybrid 2 Wearos 4 AndroidAndroid Widgets Material U Android vs Nxv01 Flower Bloom Watch Face AndroidAndroid Widgets Material U Android vs Aqua Kwgt Android

Compare another pair

FAQ

Which makes more money, Android Widgets (Material U) or WTW M18 Sport Watch Face? v
Android Widgets (Material U) earns about $1.4K per month, while WTW M18 Sport Watch Face earns about $34. That is a 40.3× revenue gap (~$1.3K more per month for Android Widgets (Material U)). Annual revenue: Android Widgets (Material U) ≈ $16.4K/year, WTW M18 Sport Watch Face ≈ $412/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Android Widgets (Material U) or WTW M18 Sport Watch Face? v
Android Widgets (Material U) leads with about 280K estimated downloads vs 1K for WTW M18 Sport Watch Face - a 224.5× gap. Android Widgets (Material U) reports 100,000+ installs on Google Play. WTW M18 Sport Watch Face reports 1,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Android Widgets (Material U) and WTW M18 Sport Watch Face in the same Google Play category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Personalization category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Android Widgets (Material U) and WTW M18 Sport Watch Face offer? v
Android Widgets (Material U): IAP range $0.99 - $1.99 per item. WTW M18 Sport Watch Face: no IAP detected on the public listing. Android Widgets (Material U) runs a "Subscription (~$1.40/mo)" monetization model; WTW M18 Sport Watch Face runs "Paid app ($2.29)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Android Widgets (Material U) or WTW M18 Sport Watch Face? v
Android Widgets (Material U) edges ahead with a higher overall score (gap of 4.3 stars). Rating volume: Android Widgets (Material U) 77 ratings, WTW M18 Sport Watch Face 0 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Android Widgets (Material U) vs WTW M18 Sport Watch Face revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $1.4K for Android Widgets (Material U) and $34 for WTW M18 Sport Watch Face are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Personalization) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Android Widgets (Material U) or WTW M18 Sport Watch Face to a different Google Play app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.