Anova Culinary vs Chick-fil-A®
Anova Culinary
Anova Applied Electronics, LLC
Google Play
$14.0K/mo
~$167.7K/yr · 1.3M installs
VS
Chick-fil-A®
Chick-fil-A, Inc.
Google Play
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 26.9M installs
Revenue winner
Anova Culinary wins
+1397400% vs other
Installs winner
Chick-fil-A® wins
+1900% vs other
MAU winner
Chick-fil-A® wins
+1220% vs other
Rating winner
Chick-fil-A® wins
+42% vs other
Why Anova Culinary is winning
Top 2 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Anova Culinary earns roughly 13974× more per month than Chick-fil-A® - $14.0K vs $0.
- Subscription model. Anova Culinary runs a $4.46/mo subscription that compounds; Chick-fil-A® relies on one-shot IAP or ads.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Anova Culinary report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Anova Culinary
vs
Chick-fil-A®
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$14.0K
◀
$0
Annual revenue (est.)
$167.7K
◀
$0
Lifetime installs (est.)
1.3M
▶
26.9M
Monthly active users (est.)?
71K
▶
941K
App Store rating
3.19★
▶
4.54★
Total ratings
28K
▶
209K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$4.46
◀
No sub
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Food & Drink
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Apr 28, 2015
- Last updated
- Jun 22, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 3.6.5
- Languages
- -
- Category
- Food & Drink
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Dec 20, 2013
- Last updated
- Jun 18, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 2026.12.3
- Languages
- -
Anova Culinary trajectory
Chick-fil-A® trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Anova Culinary or Chick-fil-A®? v
Anova Culinary earns about $14.0K per month, while Chick-fil-A® earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap (~$14.0K more per month for Anova Culinary). Annual revenue: Anova Culinary ≈ $167.7K/year, Chick-fil-A® ≈ $0/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Anova Culinary or Chick-fil-A®? v
Chick-fil-A® leads with about 26.9M estimated downloads vs 1.3M for Anova Culinary - a 20.0× gap. Anova Culinary reports 1,000,000+ installs on Google Play. Chick-fil-A® reports 10,000,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Anova Culinary and Chick-fil-A® in the same Google Play category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Food & Drink category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Anova Culinary and Chick-fil-A® offer? v
Anova Culinary: IAP range $1.99 - $9.99 per item. Chick-fil-A®: no IAP detected on the public listing. Anova Culinary runs a "Subscription (~$4.46/mo)" monetization model; Chick-fil-A® runs "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Anova Culinary or Chick-fil-A®? v
Chick-fil-A® edges ahead with ★ 4.5 vs ★ 3.2 (gap of 1.3 stars). Rating volume: Anova Culinary 6K ratings, Chick-fil-A® 69K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Anova Culinary vs Chick-fil-A® revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $14.0K for Anova Culinary and $0 for Chick-fil-A® are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Food & Drink) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Anova Culinary or Chick-fil-A® to a different Google Play app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.