Anova Culinary vs Lieferando.de
Anova Culinary
Anova Culinary
App Store
$8.8K/mo
~$105.0K/yr · 2.8M installs
VS
Lieferando.de
Takeaway.com Central Core B.V.
App Store
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 2.2M installs
Revenue winner
Anova Culinary wins
+875300% vs other
Installs winner
Anova Culinary wins
+27% vs other
MAU winner
Anova Culinary wins
+24% vs other
Rating winner
Lieferando.de wins
+8% vs other
Why Anova Culinary is winning
Top 2 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Anova Culinary earns roughly 8753× more per month than Lieferando.de - $8.8K vs $0.
- Subscription model. Anova Culinary runs a $1.99/mo subscription that compounds; Lieferando.de relies on one-shot IAP or ads.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Anova Culinary report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
vs
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$8.8K
◀
$0
Annual revenue (est.)
$105.0K
◀
$0
Lifetime installs (est.)
2.8M
◀
2.2M
Monthly active users (est.)?
326K
◀
263K
App Store rating
4.41★
▶
4.74★
Total ratings
26K
◀
20K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$1.99
◀
No sub
IAP tiers detected
2 tiers
◀
0 tiers
- Category
- Food & Drink
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Feb 4, 2015
- Last updated
- Jun 23, 2026
- File size
- 76.1 MB
- Content rating
- 12+
- Version
- 3.6.5
- Languages
- English
- Category
- Food & Drink
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Feb 18, 2011
- Last updated
- Jun 25, 2026
- File size
- 279.5 MB
- Content rating
- 12+
- Version
- 36.30.1
- Languages
- Bulgarian, Catalan, Danish, Dutch, English, French +5 more
Anova Culinary trajectory
Lieferando.de trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Anova Culinary or Lieferando.de? v
Anova Culinary earns about $8.8K per month, while Lieferando.de earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap (~$8.8K more per month for Anova Culinary). Annual revenue: Anova Culinary ≈ $105.0K/year, Lieferando.de ≈ $0/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Anova Culinary or Lieferando.de? v
Anova Culinary leads with about 2.8M estimated downloads vs 2.2M for Lieferando.de - a 1.3× gap. Anova Culinary's App Store downloads are estimated from 26K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Lieferando.de's App Store downloads are estimated from 20K ratings.
Are Anova Culinary and Lieferando.de in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Food & Drink category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Anova Culinary and Lieferando.de offer? v
Anova Culinary: IAP range 2 tiers detected. Lieferando.de: no IAP detected on the public listing. Anova Culinary runs a "Subscription (~$0.83/mo)" monetization model; Lieferando.de runs "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Anova Culinary or Lieferando.de? v
Lieferando.de edges ahead with ★ 4.7 vs ★ 4.4 (gap of 0.3 stars). Rating volume: Anova Culinary 26K ratings, Lieferando.de 20K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Anova Culinary vs Lieferando.de revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $8.8K for Anova Culinary and $0 for Lieferando.de are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Food & Drink) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Anova Culinary or Lieferando.de to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.
