Anova Culinary vs Plan to Eat

Anova Culinary

Anova Culinary
App Store
$8.8K/mo
~$105.0K/yr · 2.8M installs
VS

Plan to Eat

Plan To Eat, LLC
App Store
$8.4K/mo
~$100.8K/yr · 475K installs
Revenue winner Anova Culinary wins +4% vs other
Installs winner Anova Culinary wins +491% vs other
MAU winner Anova Culinary wins +477% vs other
Rating winner Plan to Eat wins +10% vs other

Why Anova Culinary is winning

Top 2 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.

  1. Aggressive pricing. Anova Culinary undercuts at $1.99/mo vs $4.58/mo - converts a higher % of free users.
  2. Bigger install base. Anova Culinary has ~2.8M lifetime installs vs Plan to Eat's ~475K - 5.9× the funnel top.

Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Anova Culinary report

Side-by-side metrics

Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.

Anova Culinary
vs
Plan to Eat
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$8.8K
$8.4K
Annual revenue (est.)
$105.0K
$100.8K
Lifetime installs (est.)
2.8M
475K
Monthly active users (est.)?
326K
57K
App Store rating
4.41★
4.84★
Total ratings
26K
6K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$1.99
$4.58
IAP tiers detected
2 tiers
1 tiers

Anova Culinary

Anova Culinary
App Store
Category
Food & Drink
Price
Free
Released
Feb 4, 2015
Last updated
Apr 28, 2026
File size
74.9 MB
Content rating
12+
Version
3.6.1
Languages
English
View full Anova Culinary report →

Plan to Eat

Plan To Eat, LLC
App Store
Category
Food & Drink
Price
Free
Released
Jul 19, 2017
Last updated
Apr 23, 2026
File size
18.9 MB
Content rating
4+
Version
3.7.7
Languages
English
View full Plan to Eat report →

Anova Culinary trajectory

JunJulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMay

Plan to Eat trajectory

JunJulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMay

FAQ

Which makes more money, Anova Culinary or Plan to Eat? v
Anova Culinary earns about $8.8K per month, while Plan to Eat earns about $8.4K. That is a 1.0× revenue gap (~$350 more per month for Anova Culinary). Annual revenue: Anova Culinary ≈ $105.0K/year, Plan to Eat ≈ $100.8K/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Anova Culinary or Plan to Eat? v
Anova Culinary leads with about 2.8M estimated downloads vs 475K for Plan to Eat - a 5.9× gap. Anova Culinary's App Store downloads are estimated from 26K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Plan to Eat's App Store downloads are estimated from 6K ratings.
Are Anova Culinary and Plan to Eat in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Food & Drink category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Anova Culinary and Plan to Eat offer? v
Anova Culinary: IAP range 2 tiers detected. Plan to Eat: IAP range 1 tiers detected. Anova Culinary runs a "Subscription (~$0.83/mo)" monetization model; Plan to Eat runs "Subscription (~$4.58/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Anova Culinary or Plan to Eat? v
Plan to Eat edges ahead with ★ 4.8 vs ★ 4.4 (gap of 0.4 stars). Rating volume: Anova Culinary 26K ratings, Plan to Eat 6K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Anova Culinary vs Plan to Eat revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $8.8K for Anova Culinary and $8.4K for Plan to Eat are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Food & Drink) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Anova Culinary or Plan to Eat to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.