Anova Culinary vs Plan to Eat
Anova Culinary
Anova Culinary
App Store
$8.8K/mo
~$105.0K/yr · 2.8M installs
VS
Plan to Eat
Plan To Eat, LLC
App Store
$8.4K/mo
~$100.8K/yr · 475K installs
Revenue winner
Anova Culinary wins
+4% vs other
Installs winner
Anova Culinary wins
+491% vs other
MAU winner
Anova Culinary wins
+477% vs other
Rating winner
Plan to Eat wins
+10% vs other
Why Anova Culinary is winning
Top 2 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Aggressive pricing. Anova Culinary undercuts at $1.99/mo vs $4.58/mo - converts a higher % of free users.
- Bigger install base. Anova Culinary has ~2.8M lifetime installs vs Plan to Eat's ~475K - 5.9× the funnel top.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Anova Culinary report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
vs
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$8.8K
◀
$8.4K
Annual revenue (est.)
$105.0K
◀
$100.8K
Lifetime installs (est.)
2.8M
◀
475K
Monthly active users (est.)?
326K
◀
57K
App Store rating
4.41★
▶
4.84★
Total ratings
26K
◀
6K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$1.99
▶
$4.58
IAP tiers detected
2 tiers
◀
1 tiers
- Category
- Food & Drink
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Feb 4, 2015
- Last updated
- Apr 28, 2026
- File size
- 74.9 MB
- Content rating
- 12+
- Version
- 3.6.1
- Languages
- English
- Category
- Food & Drink
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jul 19, 2017
- Last updated
- Apr 23, 2026
- File size
- 18.9 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 3.7.7
- Languages
- English
Anova Culinary trajectory
Plan to Eat trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Anova Culinary or Plan to Eat? v
Anova Culinary earns about $8.8K per month, while Plan to Eat earns about $8.4K. That is a 1.0× revenue gap (~$350 more per month for Anova Culinary). Annual revenue: Anova Culinary ≈ $105.0K/year, Plan to Eat ≈ $100.8K/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Anova Culinary or Plan to Eat? v
Anova Culinary leads with about 2.8M estimated downloads vs 475K for Plan to Eat - a 5.9× gap. Anova Culinary's App Store downloads are estimated from 26K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Plan to Eat's App Store downloads are estimated from 6K ratings.
Are Anova Culinary and Plan to Eat in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Food & Drink category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Anova Culinary and Plan to Eat offer? v
Anova Culinary: IAP range 2 tiers detected. Plan to Eat: IAP range 1 tiers detected. Anova Culinary runs a "Subscription (~$0.83/mo)" monetization model; Plan to Eat runs "Subscription (~$4.58/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Anova Culinary or Plan to Eat? v
Plan to Eat edges ahead with ★ 4.8 vs ★ 4.4 (gap of 0.4 stars). Rating volume: Anova Culinary 26K ratings, Plan to Eat 6K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Anova Culinary vs Plan to Eat revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $8.8K for Anova Culinary and $8.4K for Plan to Eat are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Food & Drink) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Anova Culinary or Plan to Eat to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.
