AOJ+ vs Intake: Calorie Log
AOJ+
Art of Jiu Jitsu
Google Play
$4.0K/mo
~$47.6K/yr · 12K installs
VS
Intake: Calorie Log
Tobias Bechtold
Google Play
$69/mo
~$834/yr · 892 installs
Revenue winner
AOJ+ wins
+5652% vs other
Installs winner
AOJ+ wins
+1246% vs other
MAU winner
AOJ+ wins
+1339% vs other
Rating winner
AOJ+ wins
+491% vs other
Why AOJ+ is winning
Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- AOJ+ earns roughly 58× more per month than Intake: Calorie Log - $4.0K vs $69.
- Premium pricing. AOJ+ charges $93.52/mo vs Intake: Calorie Log's $11.67/mo - higher ARPU per converted user.
- Bigger install base. AOJ+ has ~12K lifetime installs vs Intake: Calorie Log's ~892 - 13.5× the funnel top.
- Better app store reviews. AOJ+ sits at 4.91★ vs 0.00★ - store algorithms reward higher-rated apps with more impressions.
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
AOJ+
vs
Intake: Calorie Log
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$4.0K
◀
$69
Annual revenue (est.)
$47.6K
◀
$834
Lifetime installs (est.)
12K
◀
892
Monthly active users (est.)?
3K
◀
218.54
App Store rating
4.91★
◀
-
Total ratings
149
◀
0
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$93.52
◀
$11.67
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Apr 29, 2022
- Last updated
- May 28, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- VARY
- Languages
- -
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- USD6.49
- Released
- Mar 3, 2026
- Last updated
- Jun 24, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 2.4.2
- Languages
- -
AOJ+ trajectory
Intake: Calorie Log trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, AOJ+ or Intake: Calorie Log? v
AOJ+ earns about $4.0K per month, while Intake: Calorie Log earns about $69. That is a 57.5× revenue gap (~$3.9K more per month for AOJ+). Annual revenue: AOJ+ ≈ $47.6K/year, Intake: Calorie Log ≈ $834/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, AOJ+ or Intake: Calorie Log? v
AOJ+ leads with about 12K estimated downloads vs 892 for Intake: Calorie Log - a 13.5× gap. AOJ+ reports 10,000+ installs on Google Play. Intake: Calorie Log reports 500+ installs on Google Play.
Are AOJ+ and Intake: Calorie Log in the same Google Play category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do AOJ+ and Intake: Calorie Log offer? v
AOJ+: IAP range $24.99 - $349.99 per item. Intake: Calorie Log: IAP range $3.49 - $38.99 per item. AOJ+ runs a "Subscription (~$93.52/mo)" monetization model; Intake: Calorie Log runs "Paid app ($6.49)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, AOJ+ or Intake: Calorie Log? v
AOJ+ edges ahead with a higher overall score (gap of 4.9 stars). Rating volume: AOJ+ 3 ratings, Intake: Calorie Log 0 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these AOJ+ vs Intake: Calorie Log revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $4.0K for AOJ+ and $69 for Intake: Calorie Log are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare AOJ+ or Intake: Calorie Log to a different Google Play app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.