Aoocat vs Timeshifter
Aoocat
Henan Jiuchong Commerce and Trade Co., Ltd.
App Store
$2.3K/mo
~$27.2K/yr · 7K installs
VS
Timeshifter
Timeshifter Inc.
App Store
$11.7K/mo
~$140.1K/yr · 199K installs
Revenue winner
Timeshifter wins
+415% vs other
Installs winner
Timeshifter wins
+2960% vs other
MAU winner
Timeshifter wins
+3255% vs other
Rating winner
Timeshifter wins
+35% vs other
Why Timeshifter is winning
Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Timeshifter earns roughly 5× more per month than Aoocat - $11.7K vs $2.3K.
- Aggressive pricing. Timeshifter undercuts at $9.99/mo vs $64.99/mo - converts a higher % of free users.
- Bigger install base. Timeshifter has ~199K lifetime installs vs Aoocat's ~7K - 30.6× the funnel top.
- Better app store reviews. Timeshifter sits at 4.67★ vs 3.45★ - store algorithms reward higher-rated apps with more impressions.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Timeshifter report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Aoocat
vs
Timeshifter
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$2.3K
▶
$11.7K
Annual revenue (est.)
$27.2K
▶
$140.1K
Lifetime installs (est.)
7K
▶
199K
Monthly active users (est.)?
1K
▶
36K
App Store rating
3.45★
▶
4.67★
Total ratings
130
▶
2K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$64.99
◀
$9.99
IAP tiers detected
10 tiers
◀
3 tiers
- Category
- Travel
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Mar 18, 2021
- Last updated
- Mar 19, 2026
- File size
- 59.2 MB
- Content rating
- 12+
- Version
- 1.8.9
- Languages
- English, Chinese
- Category
- Travel
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jun 20, 2018
- Last updated
- Jul 2, 2025
- File size
- 43.5 MB
- Content rating
- 12+
- Version
- 2.1.39
- Languages
- English
Aoocat trajectory
Timeshifter trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Aoocat or Timeshifter? v
Timeshifter earns about $11.7K per month, while Aoocat earns about $2.3K. That is a 5.2× revenue gap (~$9.4K more per month for Timeshifter). Annual revenue: Aoocat ≈ $27.2K/year, Timeshifter ≈ $140.1K/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Aoocat or Timeshifter? v
Timeshifter leads with about 199K estimated downloads vs 7K for Aoocat - a 30.6× gap. Aoocat's App Store downloads are estimated from 130 ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Timeshifter's App Store downloads are estimated from 2K ratings.
Are Aoocat and Timeshifter in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Travel category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Aoocat and Timeshifter offer? v
Aoocat: IAP range 10 tiers detected. Timeshifter: IAP range 3 tiers detected. Aoocat runs a "Subscription (~$64.99/mo)" monetization model; Timeshifter runs "Subscription (~$9.99/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Aoocat or Timeshifter? v
Timeshifter edges ahead with ★ 4.7 vs ★ 3.4 (gap of 1.2 stars). Rating volume: Aoocat 130 ratings, Timeshifter 2K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Aoocat vs Timeshifter revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $2.3K for Aoocat and $11.7K for Timeshifter are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Travel) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Aoocat or Timeshifter to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.