Aosu vs Fieldy - AI note taker

Aosu earns about $632 per month, while Fieldy - AI note taker earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap (~$632 more per month for Aosu). Annual revenue: Aosu ≈ $7.6K/year, Fieldy - AI note taker ≈ $0/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.

Fieldy - AI note taker leads with about 38K estimated downloads vs 31K for Aosu - a 1.2× gap. Aosu's App Store downloads are estimated from 629 ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Fieldy - AI note taker's App Store downloads are estimated from 753 ratings.

Yes - both apps sit in the Utilities category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.

Aosu: IAP range 10 tiers detected. Fieldy - AI note taker: no IAP detected on the public listing. Aosu runs a "Subscription (~$5.69/mo)" monetization model; Fieldy - AI note taker runs "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.

Fieldy - AI note taker edges ahead with ★ 4.6 vs ★ 3.7 (gap of 1.0 stars). Rating volume: Aosu 629 ratings, Fieldy - AI note taker 753 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.

Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $632 for Aosu and $0 for Fieldy - AI note taker are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Utilities) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.

Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.