Aosu vs QQ浏览器-腾讯AI浏览器
Aosu
AOSU LIFE INC.
App Store
$594/mo
~$7.1K/yr · 30K installs
VS
QQ浏览器-腾讯AI浏览器
Tencent Technology (Shenzhen) Company Limited
App Store
$3.0K/mo
~$36.2K/yr · 91K installs
Revenue winner
QQ浏览器-腾讯AI浏览器 wins
+408% vs other
Installs winner
QQ浏览器-腾讯AI浏览器 wins
+209% vs other
MAU winner
QQ浏览器-腾讯AI浏览器 wins
+223% vs other
Rating winner
QQ浏览器-腾讯AI浏览器 wins
+14% vs other
Why QQ浏览器-腾讯AI浏览器 is winning
Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- QQ浏览器-腾讯AI浏览器 earns roughly 5× more per month than Aosu - $3.0K vs $594.
- Premium pricing. QQ浏览器-腾讯AI浏览器 charges $8.99/mo vs Aosu's $4.49/mo - higher ARPU per converted user.
- Bigger install base. QQ浏览器-腾讯AI浏览器 has ~91K lifetime installs vs Aosu's ~30K - 3.1× the funnel top.
- Better app store reviews. QQ浏览器-腾讯AI浏览器 sits at 4.19★ vs 3.67★ - store algorithms reward higher-rated apps with more impressions.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full QQ浏览器-腾讯AI浏览器 report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Aosu
vs
QQ浏览器-腾讯AI浏览器
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$594
▶
$3.0K
Annual revenue (est.)
$7.1K
▶
$36.2K
Lifetime installs (est.)
30K
▶
91K
Monthly active users (est.)?
3K
▶
10K
App Store rating
3.67★
▶
4.19★
Total ratings
590
▶
1K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$4.49
▶
$8.99
IAP tiers detected
10 tiers
=
10 tiers
- Category
- Utilities
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Aug 11, 2021
- Last updated
- May 8, 2026
- File size
- 602.4 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 5.1.20
- Languages
- Arabic, AZ, BA, EU, BE, BN +62 more
- Category
- Utilities
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jun 16, 2010
- Last updated
- May 8, 2026
- File size
- 488.7 MB
- Content rating
- 17+
- Version
- 20.1.2
- Languages
- English, Chinese
Aosu trajectory
QQ浏览器-腾讯AI浏览器 trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Aosu or QQ浏览器-腾讯AI浏览器? v
QQ浏览器-腾讯AI浏览器 earns about $3.0K per month, while Aosu earns about $594. That is a 5.1× revenue gap (~$2.4K more per month for QQ浏览器-腾讯AI浏览器). Annual revenue: Aosu ≈ $7.1K/year, QQ浏览器-腾讯AI浏览器 ≈ $36.2K/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Aosu or QQ浏览器-腾讯AI浏览器? v
QQ浏览器-腾讯AI浏览器 leads with about 91K estimated downloads vs 30K for Aosu - a 3.1× gap. Aosu's App Store downloads are estimated from 589 ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. QQ浏览器-腾讯AI浏览器's App Store downloads are estimated from 1K ratings.
Are Aosu and QQ浏览器-腾讯AI浏览器 in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Utilities category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Aosu and QQ浏览器-腾讯AI浏览器 offer? v
Aosu: IAP range 10 tiers detected. QQ浏览器-腾讯AI浏览器: IAP range 10 tiers detected. Aosu runs a "Subscription (~$5.69/mo)" monetization model; QQ浏览器-腾讯AI浏览器 runs "Subscription (~$8.99/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Aosu or QQ浏览器-腾讯AI浏览器? v
QQ浏览器-腾讯AI浏览器 edges ahead with ★ 4.2 vs ★ 3.7 (gap of 0.5 stars). Rating volume: Aosu 589 ratings, QQ浏览器-腾讯AI浏览器 1K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Aosu vs QQ浏览器-腾讯AI浏览器 revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $594 for Aosu and $3.0K for QQ浏览器-腾讯AI浏览器 are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Utilities) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Aosu or QQ浏览器-腾讯AI浏览器 to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.