Apollo Neuro vs Fitia: Calorie Counter & Plans
Apollo Neuro
Apollo Neuro
App Store
$8.8K/mo
~$105.4K/yr · 143K installs
VS
Fitia: Calorie Counter & Plans
Fitia Technologies
Google Play
$674.8K/mo
~$8.10M/yr · 13.5M installs
Revenue winner
Fitia: Calorie Counter & Plans wins
+7582% vs other
Installs winner
Fitia: Calorie Counter & Plans wins
+9364% vs other
MAU winner
Fitia: Calorie Counter & Plans wins
+3179% vs other
Rating winner
Fitia: Calorie Counter & Plans wins
+8% vs other
Why Fitia: Calorie Counter & Plans is winning
Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Fitia: Calorie Counter & Plans earns roughly 77× more per month than Apollo Neuro - $674.8K vs $8.8K.
- Premium pricing. Fitia: Calorie Counter & Plans charges $9.44/mo vs Apollo Neuro's $7.50/mo - higher ARPU per converted user.
- Bigger install base. Fitia: Calorie Counter & Plans has ~13.5M lifetime installs vs Apollo Neuro's ~143K - 94.6× the funnel top.
- Better app store reviews. Fitia: Calorie Counter & Plans sits at 4.83★ vs 4.47★ - store algorithms reward higher-rated apps with more impressions.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Fitia: Calorie Counter & Plans report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Apollo Neuro
vs
Fitia: Calorie Counter & Plans
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$8.8K
▶
$674.8K
Annual revenue (est.)
$105.4K
▶
$8.10M
Lifetime installs (est.)
143K
▶
13.5M
Monthly active users (est.)?
36K
▶
1.2M
App Store rating
4.47★
▶
4.83★
Total ratings
2K
▶
350K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$7.50
▶
$9.44
IAP tiers detected
3 tiers
◀
0 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jan 19, 2020
- Last updated
- Apr 13, 2026
- File size
- 646.0 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 4.3.3
- Languages
- English, Japanese
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jun 17, 2019
- Last updated
- May 6, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 24.0.1
- Languages
- -
Apollo Neuro trajectory
Fitia: Calorie Counter & Plans trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Apollo Neuro or Fitia: Calorie Counter & Plans? v
Fitia: Calorie Counter & Plans earns about $674.8K per month, while Apollo Neuro earns about $8.8K. That is a 76.8× revenue gap (~$666.0K more per month for Fitia: Calorie Counter & Plans). Annual revenue: Apollo Neuro ≈ $105.4K/year, Fitia: Calorie Counter & Plans ≈ $8.10M/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store / Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Apollo Neuro or Fitia: Calorie Counter & Plans? v
Fitia: Calorie Counter & Plans leads with about 13.5M estimated downloads vs 143K for Apollo Neuro - a 94.6× gap. Apollo Neuro's App Store downloads are estimated from 2K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Fitia: Calorie Counter & Plans reports 10,000,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Apollo Neuro and Fitia: Calorie Counter & Plans in the same App Store category on each store and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Apollo Neuro and Fitia: Calorie Counter & Plans offer? v
Apollo Neuro: IAP range 3 tiers detected. Fitia: Calorie Counter & Plans: IAP range $0.99 - $89.99 per item. Apollo Neuro runs a "Subscription (~$7.50/mo)" monetization model; Fitia: Calorie Counter & Plans runs "Subscription (~$9.44/mo, fitness-sub)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Apollo Neuro or Fitia: Calorie Counter & Plans? v
Fitia: Calorie Counter & Plans edges ahead with ★ 4.8 vs ★ 4.5 (gap of 0.4 stars). Rating volume: Apollo Neuro 2K ratings, Fitia: Calorie Counter & Plans 762 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Apollo Neuro vs Fitia: Calorie Counter & Plans revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $8.8K for Apollo Neuro and $674.8K for Fitia: Calorie Counter & Plans are derived from App Store grossing rank / Google Play install ranges, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Apollo Neuro or Fitia: Calorie Counter & Plans to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store or Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.