Apollo Neuro vs Ivy: Processed Food Scanner

Ivy: Processed Food Scanner earns about $0 per month, while Apollo Neuro earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap. Annual revenue: Apollo Neuro ≈ $0/year, Ivy: Processed Food Scanner ≈ $0/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.

Ivy: Processed Food Scanner leads with about 452K estimated downloads vs 146K for Apollo Neuro - a 3.1× gap. Apollo Neuro's App Store downloads are estimated from 2K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Ivy: Processed Food Scanner's App Store downloads are estimated from 6K ratings.

Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.

Apollo Neuro does not appear to offer in-app purchases on its public listing. Ivy: Processed Food Scanner does not appear to offer in-app purchases. Monetization model: Apollo Neuro runs "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)", Ivy: Processed Food Scanner runs "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)".

Ivy: Processed Food Scanner edges ahead with ★ 4.8 vs ★ 4.5 (gap of 0.3 stars). Rating volume: Apollo Neuro 2K ratings, Ivy: Processed Food Scanner 6K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.

Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $0 for Apollo Neuro and $0 for Ivy: Processed Food Scanner are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.

Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.