테이블링 vs Intact Insurance: Mobile app

테이블링

테이블링(주)
Google Play
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 4.7M installs
VS

Intact Insurance: Mobile app

Intact Insurance
Google Play
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 1.3M installs
Revenue winnerTied
Installs winner 테이블링 wins +267% vs other
MAU winner 테이블링 wins +8% vs other
Rating winner 테이블링 wins +24% vs other

Why 테이블링 is winning

Top 2 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.

  1. Bigger install base. 테이블링 has ~4.7M lifetime installs vs Intact Insurance: Mobile app's ~1.3M - 3.7× the funnel top.
  2. Better app store reviews. 테이블링 sits at 4.51★ vs 3.65★ - store algorithms reward higher-rated apps with more impressions.

Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full 테이블링 report

Side-by-side metrics

Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.

테이블링
vs
Intact Insurance: Mobile app
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$0
=
$0
Annual revenue (est.)
$0
=
$0
Lifetime installs (est.)
4.7M
1.3M
Monthly active users (est.)?
273K
254K
App Store rating
4.51★
3.65★
Total ratings
42K
53K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
=
No sub
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers

테이블링

테이블링(주)
Google Play
Category
Food & Drink
Price
Free
Released
Mar 26, 2018
Last updated
Jun 4, 2026
File size
-
Content rating
Everyone
Version
4.30.0
Languages
-
View full 테이블링 report →

Intact Insurance: Mobile app

Intact Insurance
Google Play
Category
Finance
Price
Free
Released
-
Last updated
Jun 4, 2026
File size
-
Content rating
Everyone
Version
5.76.0
Languages
-
View full Intact Insurance: Mobile app report →

테이블링 trajectory

JulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMayJun

Intact Insurance: Mobile app trajectory

JulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMayJun

FAQ

Which makes more money, 테이블링 or Intact Insurance: Mobile app? v
Intact Insurance: Mobile app earns about $0 per month, while 테이블링 earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap. Annual revenue: 테이블링 ≈ $0/year, Intact Insurance: Mobile app ≈ $0/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, 테이블링 or Intact Insurance: Mobile app? v
테이블링 leads with about 4.7M estimated downloads vs 1.3M for Intact Insurance: Mobile app - a 3.7× gap. 테이블링 reports 1,000,000+ installs on Google Play. Intact Insurance: Mobile app reports 1,000,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are 테이블링 and Intact Insurance: Mobile app in the same Google Play category and competing for the same money? v
No - 테이블링 is in Food & Drink and Intact Insurance: Mobile app is in Finance. They share screen-time attention but earn money in different niches: 테이블링 from food & drink monetization patterns, Intact Insurance: Mobile app from finance.
Do 테이블링 and Intact Insurance: Mobile app have in-app purchases? v
테이블링 does not appear to offer in-app purchases on its public listing. Intact Insurance: Mobile app does not appear to offer in-app purchases. Monetization model: 테이블링 runs "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)", Intact Insurance: Mobile app runs "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)".
Which has better ratings, 테이블링 or Intact Insurance: Mobile app? v
테이블링 edges ahead with ★ 4.5 vs ★ 3.6 (gap of 0.9 stars). Rating volume: 테이블링 4 ratings, Intact Insurance: Mobile app 13 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these 테이블링 vs Intact Insurance: Mobile app revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $0 for 테이블링 and $0 for Intact Insurance: Mobile app are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Food & Drink / Finance) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare 테이블링 or Intact Insurance: Mobile app to a different Google Play app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.