Aptitude Test Trainer vs CITB MAP HS&E test V10
Aptitude Test Trainer
Seliant ApS
App Store
$64/mo
~$767/yr · 400 installs
VS
CITB MAP HS&E test V10
CITB
App Store
$75/mo
~$895/yr · 400 installs
Revenue winner
CITB MAP HS&E test V10 wins
+17% vs other
Installs winnerTied
MAU winner
CITB MAP HS&E test V10 wins
+11% vs other
Rating winner
CITB MAP HS&E test V10 wins
+38% vs other
Why CITB MAP HS&E test V10 is winning
Top 1 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Better app store reviews. CITB MAP HS&E test V10 sits at 5.00★ vs 3.63★ - store algorithms reward higher-rated apps with more impressions.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full CITB MAP HS&E test V10 report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
vs
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$64
▶
$75
Annual revenue (est.)
$767
▶
$895
Lifetime installs (est.)
400
=
400
Monthly active users (est.)?
43.6
▶
48.4
App Store rating
3.63★
▶
5.00★
Total ratings
8
◀
1
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
=
No sub
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Education
- Price
- USD5.99
- Released
- Aug 31, 2012
- Last updated
- Mar 17, 2026
- File size
- 136.1 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 8.5
- Languages
- English
- Category
- Education
- Price
- USD6.99
- Released
- May 2, 2023
- Last updated
- Jan 8, 2026
- File size
- 174.3 MB
- Content rating
- 12+
- Version
- 2.0.14
- Languages
- English
Aptitude Test Trainer trajectory
CITB MAP HS&E test V10 trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Aptitude Test Trainer or CITB MAP HS&E test V10? v
CITB MAP HS&E test V10 earns about $75 per month, while Aptitude Test Trainer earns about $64. That is a 1.2× revenue gap (~$11 more per month for CITB MAP HS&E test V10). Annual revenue: Aptitude Test Trainer ≈ $767/year, CITB MAP HS&E test V10 ≈ $895/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Aptitude Test Trainer or CITB MAP HS&E test V10? v
CITB MAP HS&E test V10 leads with about 400 estimated downloads vs 400 for Aptitude Test Trainer - a 1.0× gap. Aptitude Test Trainer's App Store downloads are estimated from 8 ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. CITB MAP HS&E test V10's App Store downloads are estimated from 1 ratings.
Are Aptitude Test Trainer and CITB MAP HS&E test V10 in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Education category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
Do Aptitude Test Trainer and CITB MAP HS&E test V10 have in-app purchases? v
Aptitude Test Trainer does not appear to offer in-app purchases on its public listing. CITB MAP HS&E test V10 does not appear to offer in-app purchases. Monetization model: Aptitude Test Trainer runs "Paid app ($5.99)", CITB MAP HS&E test V10 runs "Paid app ($6.99)".
Which has better ratings, Aptitude Test Trainer or CITB MAP HS&E test V10? v
CITB MAP HS&E test V10 edges ahead with ★ 5.0 vs ★ 3.6 (gap of 1.4 stars). Rating volume: Aptitude Test Trainer 8 ratings, CITB MAP HS&E test V10 1 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Aptitude Test Trainer vs CITB MAP HS&E test V10 revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $64 for Aptitude Test Trainer and $75 for CITB MAP HS&E test V10 are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Education) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Aptitude Test Trainer or CITB MAP HS&E test V10 to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.
