aqua kwgt vs Glass Icon Pack
aqua kwgt
Wigebox
Google Play
$56/mo
~$671/yr · 3K installs
VS
Glass Icon Pack
AppsLab Co.
Google Play
$230/mo
~$2.8K/yr · 13K installs
Revenue winner
Glass Icon Pack wins
+311% vs other
Installs winner
Glass Icon Pack wins
+311% vs other
MAU winner
Glass Icon Pack wins
+304% vs other
Rating winner
aqua kwgt wins
+7% vs other
Why Glass Icon Pack is winning
Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Glass Icon Pack earns roughly 4× more per month than aqua kwgt - $230 vs $56.
- Subscription model. Glass Icon Pack runs a $4.35/mo subscription that compounds; aqua kwgt relies on one-shot IAP or ads.
- Bigger install base. Glass Icon Pack has ~13K lifetime installs vs aqua kwgt's ~3K - 4.1× the funnel top.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Glass Icon Pack report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
vs
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$56
▶
$230
Annual revenue (est.)
$671
▶
$2.8K
Lifetime installs (est.)
3K
▶
13K
Monthly active users (est.)?
347.097
▶
1K
App Store rating
3.83★
◀
3.57★
Total ratings
39
▶
168
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
▶
$4.35
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Personalization
- Price
- USD1.49
- Released
- Jan 17, 2025
- Last updated
- Sep 6, 2025
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 7.0.3
- Languages
- -
- Category
- Personalization
- Price
- USD1.49
- Released
- Nov 24, 2025
- Last updated
- Jan 26, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 1.2
- Languages
- -
aqua kwgt trajectory
Glass Icon Pack trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, aqua kwgt or Glass Icon Pack? v
Glass Icon Pack earns about $230 per month, while aqua kwgt earns about $56. That is a 4.1× revenue gap (~$174 more per month for Glass Icon Pack). Annual revenue: aqua kwgt ≈ $671/year, Glass Icon Pack ≈ $2.8K/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, aqua kwgt or Glass Icon Pack? v
Glass Icon Pack leads with about 13K estimated downloads vs 3K for aqua kwgt - a 4.1× gap. aqua kwgt reports 1,000+ installs on Google Play. Glass Icon Pack reports 10,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are aqua kwgt and Glass Icon Pack in the same Google Play category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Personalization category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do aqua kwgt and Glass Icon Pack offer? v
aqua kwgt: no IAP detected on the public listing. Glass Icon Pack: IAP range $1.99 - $9.49 per item. aqua kwgt runs a "Paid app ($1.49)" monetization model; Glass Icon Pack runs "Paid app ($1.49)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, aqua kwgt or Glass Icon Pack? v
aqua kwgt edges ahead with ★ 3.8 vs ★ 3.6 (gap of 0.3 stars). Rating volume: aqua kwgt 4 ratings, Glass Icon Pack 9 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these aqua kwgt vs Glass Icon Pack revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $56 for aqua kwgt and $230 for Glass Icon Pack are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Personalization) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare aqua kwgt or Glass Icon Pack to a different Google Play app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.
