ARGO - Social Video Chat vs QQ邮箱
ARGO - Social Video Chat
ARGOZONE CO. , LTD
App Store
$340/mo
~$4.1K/yr · 3K installs
VS
QQ邮箱
Tencent Technology (Shenzhen) Company Limited
App Store
$2.9K/mo
~$34.9K/yr · 36K installs
Revenue winner
QQ邮箱 wins
+756% vs other
Installs winner
QQ邮箱 wins
+1248% vs other
MAU winner
QQ邮箱 wins
+851% vs other
Rating winner
QQ邮箱 wins
+22% vs other
Why QQ邮箱 is winning
Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- QQ邮箱 earns roughly 9× more per month than ARGO - Social Video Chat - $2.9K vs $340.
- Aggressive pricing. QQ邮箱 undercuts at $8.99/mo vs $12.99/mo - converts a higher % of free users.
- Bigger install base. QQ邮箱 has ~36K lifetime installs vs ARGO - Social Video Chat's ~3K - 13.5× the funnel top.
- More monetization surfaces. QQ邮箱 runs 7 IAP tiers vs 6 - more chances to convert users at the right price.
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
ARGO - Social Video Chat
vs
QQ邮箱
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$340
▶
$2.9K
Annual revenue (est.)
$4.1K
▶
$34.9K
Lifetime installs (est.)
3K
▶
36K
Monthly active users (est.)?
1K
▶
10K
App Store rating
2.93★
▶
3.56★
Total ratings
54
▶
728
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$12.99
◀
$8.99
IAP tiers detected
6 tiers
▶
7 tiers
- Category
- Social Networking
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Mar 20, 2017
- Last updated
- May 28, 2026
- File size
- 161.8 MB
- Content rating
- 17+
- Version
- 3.2.46
- Languages
- AM, Arabic, AZ, BN, MY, KM +38 more
- Category
- Productivity
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Oct 24, 2011
- Last updated
- May 6, 2026
- File size
- 173.5 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 7.1.6
- Languages
- English, Chinese, Chinese
ARGO - Social Video Chat trajectory
QQ邮箱 trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, ARGO - Social Video Chat or QQ邮箱? v
QQ邮箱 earns about $2.9K per month, while ARGO - Social Video Chat earns about $340. That is a 8.6× revenue gap (~$2.6K more per month for QQ邮箱). Annual revenue: ARGO - Social Video Chat ≈ $4.1K/year, QQ邮箱 ≈ $34.9K/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, ARGO - Social Video Chat or QQ邮箱? v
QQ邮箱 leads with about 36K estimated downloads vs 3K for ARGO - Social Video Chat - a 13.5× gap. ARGO - Social Video Chat's App Store downloads are estimated from 54 ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. QQ邮箱's App Store downloads are estimated from 728 ratings.
Are ARGO - Social Video Chat and QQ邮箱 in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
No - ARGO - Social Video Chat is in Social Networking and QQ邮箱 is in Productivity. They share screen-time attention but earn money in different niches: ARGO - Social Video Chat from social networking monetization patterns, QQ邮箱 from productivity.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do ARGO - Social Video Chat and QQ邮箱 offer? v
ARGO - Social Video Chat: IAP range 6 tiers detected. QQ邮箱: IAP range 7 tiers detected. ARGO - Social Video Chat runs a "Subscription (~$10.00/mo)" monetization model; QQ邮箱 runs "Subscription (~$8.99/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, ARGO - Social Video Chat or QQ邮箱? v
QQ邮箱 edges ahead with ★ 3.6 vs ★ 2.9 (gap of 0.6 stars). Rating volume: ARGO - Social Video Chat 54 ratings, QQ邮箱 728 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these ARGO - Social Video Chat vs QQ邮箱 revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $340 for ARGO - Social Video Chat and $2.9K for QQ邮箱 are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Social Networking / Productivity) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare ARGO - Social Video Chat or QQ邮箱 to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.