Arise: AI Food Calorie Counter vs Google Fit: Activity Tracking
Arise: AI Food Calorie Counter
A.R.I.S.E. Apps resulting in self enhancement Ltd.
App Store
$15.0K/mo
~$180.2K/yr · 259K installs
VS
Google Fit: Activity Tracking
Google LLC
Google Play
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 356.3M installs
Revenue winner
Arise: AI Food Calorie Counter wins
+1501800% vs other
Installs winner
Google Fit: Activity Tracking wins
+137371% vs other
MAU winner
Google Fit: Activity Tracking wins
+17621% vs other
Rating winner
Arise: AI Food Calorie Counter wins
+34% vs other
Why Arise: AI Food Calorie Counter is winning
Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Arise: AI Food Calorie Counter earns roughly 15018× more per month than Google Fit: Activity Tracking - $15.0K vs $0.
- Subscription model. Arise: AI Food Calorie Counter runs a $6.99/mo subscription that compounds; Google Fit: Activity Tracking relies on one-shot IAP or ads.
- Better app store reviews. Arise: AI Food Calorie Counter sits at 4.63★ vs 3.45★ - store algorithms reward higher-rated apps with more impressions.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Arise: AI Food Calorie Counter report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Arise: AI Food Calorie Counter
vs
Google Fit: Activity Tracking
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$15.0K
◀
$0
Annual revenue (est.)
$180.2K
◀
$0
Lifetime installs (est.)
259K
▶
356.3M
Monthly active users (est.)?
66K
▶
11.8M
App Store rating
4.63★
◀
3.45★
Total ratings
3K
▶
682K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$6.99
◀
No sub
IAP tiers detected
1 tiers
◀
0 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Nov 3, 2012
- Last updated
- Jul 3, 2026
- File size
- 120.4 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 45.3.1
- Languages
- Dutch, English, French, German, Italian, Japanese +7 more
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Oct 28, 2014
- Last updated
- Jun 15, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- VARY
- Languages
- -
Arise: AI Food Calorie Counter trajectory
Google Fit: Activity Tracking trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Arise: AI Food Calorie Counter or Google Fit: Activity Tracking? v
Arise: AI Food Calorie Counter earns about $15.0K per month, while Google Fit: Activity Tracking earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap (~$15.0K more per month for Arise: AI Food Calorie Counter). Annual revenue: Arise: AI Food Calorie Counter ≈ $180.2K/year, Google Fit: Activity Tracking ≈ $0/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store / Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Arise: AI Food Calorie Counter or Google Fit: Activity Tracking? v
Google Fit: Activity Tracking leads with about 356.3M estimated downloads vs 259K for Arise: AI Food Calorie Counter - a 1374.7× gap. Arise: AI Food Calorie Counter's App Store downloads are estimated from 3K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Google Fit: Activity Tracking reports 100,000,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Arise: AI Food Calorie Counter and Google Fit: Activity Tracking in the same App Store category on each store and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Arise: AI Food Calorie Counter and Google Fit: Activity Tracking offer? v
Arise: AI Food Calorie Counter: IAP range 1 tiers detected. Google Fit: Activity Tracking: no IAP detected on the public listing. Arise: AI Food Calorie Counter runs a "Subscription (~$6.99/mo)" monetization model; Google Fit: Activity Tracking runs "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Arise: AI Food Calorie Counter or Google Fit: Activity Tracking? v
Arise: AI Food Calorie Counter edges ahead with ★ 4.6 vs ★ 3.5 (gap of 1.2 stars). Rating volume: Arise: AI Food Calorie Counter 3K ratings, Google Fit: Activity Tracking 30K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Arise: AI Food Calorie Counter vs Google Fit: Activity Tracking revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $15.0K for Arise: AI Food Calorie Counter and $0 for Google Fit: Activity Tracking are derived from App Store grossing rank / Google Play install ranges, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Arise: AI Food Calorie Counter or Google Fit: Activity Tracking to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store or Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.