Athlogic - AI Fitness Coach vs Fitlog - AI Macro Food Tracker

Fitlog - AI Macro Food Tracker earns about $221 per month, while Athlogic - AI Fitness Coach earns about $147. That is a 1.5× revenue gap (~$74 more per month for Fitlog - AI Macro Food Tracker). Annual revenue: Athlogic - AI Fitness Coach ≈ $1.8K/year, Fitlog - AI Macro Food Tracker ≈ $2.6K/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.

Fitlog - AI Macro Food Tracker leads with about 1K estimated downloads vs 836 for Athlogic - AI Fitness Coach - a 1.7× gap. Athlogic - AI Fitness Coach reports 500+ installs on Google Play. Fitlog - AI Macro Food Tracker reports 1,000+ installs on Google Play.

Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.

Athlogic - AI Fitness Coach: IAP range $7.99 - $45.99 per item. Fitlog - AI Macro Food Tracker: IAP range $25.99 per item. Athlogic - AI Fitness Coach runs a "Subscription (~$19.17/mo, fitness-sub)" monetization model; Fitlog - AI Macro Food Tracker runs "Subscription (~$2.08/mo, fitness-sub)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.

Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $147 for Athlogic - AI Fitness Coach and $221 for Fitlog - AI Macro Food Tracker are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.

Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.