Atlas Operations vs FPS Meter Real-time Display

FPS Meter Real-time Display earns about $61 per month, while Atlas Operations earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap (~$61 more per month for FPS Meter Real-time Display). Annual revenue: Atlas Operations ≈ $0/year, FPS Meter Real-time Display ≈ $729/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.

FPS Meter Real-time Display leads with about 10K estimated downloads vs 47 for Atlas Operations - a 219.8× gap. Atlas Operations reports 10+ installs on Google Play. FPS Meter Real-time Display reports 10,000+ installs on Google Play.

Yes - both apps sit in the Tools category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.

Atlas Operations does not appear to offer in-app purchases on its public listing. FPS Meter Real-time Display does not appear to offer in-app purchases. Monetization model: Atlas Operations runs "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)", FPS Meter Real-time Display runs "Paid app ($0.49)".

FPS Meter Real-time Display edges ahead with a higher overall score (gap of 2.9 stars). Rating volume: Atlas Operations 0 ratings, FPS Meter Real-time Display 5 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.

Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $0 for Atlas Operations and $61 for FPS Meter Real-time Display are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Tools) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.

Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.