Aurora Watch Face vs VFM01 Minimal Digital
Aurora Watch Face
amoledwatchfaces™
Google Play
$67/mo
~$805/yr · 4K installs
VS
VFM01 Minimal Digital
VeselkaFace DESIGN
Google Play
$24/mo
~$291/yr · 2K installs
Revenue winner
Aurora Watch Face wins
+179% vs other
Installs winner
Aurora Watch Face wins
+97% vs other
MAU winner
Aurora Watch Face wins
+97% vs other
Rating winner
VFM01 Minimal Digital wins
+1% vs other
Why Aurora Watch Face is winning
Top 2 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Aurora Watch Face earns roughly 3× more per month than VFM01 Minimal Digital - $67 vs $24.
- Bigger install base. Aurora Watch Face has ~4K lifetime installs vs VFM01 Minimal Digital's ~2K - 2.0× the funnel top.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Aurora Watch Face report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
vs
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$67
◀
$24
Annual revenue (est.)
$805
◀
$291
Lifetime installs (est.)
4K
◀
2K
Monthly active users (est.)?
474.714
◀
240.602
App Store rating
4.63★
▶
4.67★
Total ratings
92
◀
45
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
=
No sub
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Personalization
- Price
- USD1.39
- Released
- Dec 30, 2024
- Last updated
- Aug 31, 2025
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- VARY
- Languages
- -
- Category
- Personalization
- Price
- USD0.99
- Released
- Oct 18, 2025
- Last updated
- May 9, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 1.0.0
- Languages
- -
Aurora Watch Face trajectory
VFM01 Minimal Digital trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Aurora Watch Face or VFM01 Minimal Digital? v
Aurora Watch Face earns about $67 per month, while VFM01 Minimal Digital earns about $24. That is a 2.8× revenue gap (~$43 more per month for Aurora Watch Face). Annual revenue: Aurora Watch Face ≈ $805/year, VFM01 Minimal Digital ≈ $291/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Aurora Watch Face or VFM01 Minimal Digital? v
Aurora Watch Face leads with about 4K estimated downloads vs 2K for VFM01 Minimal Digital - a 2.0× gap. Aurora Watch Face reports 1,000+ installs on Google Play. VFM01 Minimal Digital reports 1,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Aurora Watch Face and VFM01 Minimal Digital in the same Google Play category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Personalization category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
Do Aurora Watch Face and VFM01 Minimal Digital have in-app purchases? v
Aurora Watch Face does not appear to offer in-app purchases on its public listing. VFM01 Minimal Digital does not appear to offer in-app purchases. Monetization model: Aurora Watch Face runs "Paid app ($1.39)", VFM01 Minimal Digital runs "Paid app ($0.99)".
Which has better ratings, Aurora Watch Face or VFM01 Minimal Digital? v
VFM01 Minimal Digital edges ahead with ★ 4.7 vs ★ 4.6 (gap of 0.0 stars). Rating volume: Aurora Watch Face 15 ratings, VFM01 Minimal Digital 1 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Aurora Watch Face vs VFM01 Minimal Digital revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $67 for Aurora Watch Face and $24 for VFM01 Minimal Digital are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Personalization) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Aurora Watch Face or VFM01 Minimal Digital to a different Google Play app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.
