Australia Post vs Etracker TimeSync
Australia Post
Australia Post
App Store
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 104K installs
VS
Etracker TimeSync
Aliona Herghelea
App Store
$70/mo
~$837/yr · 400 installs
Revenue winner
Etracker TimeSync wins
+7000% vs other
Installs winner
Australia Post wins
+26000% vs other
MAU winner
Australia Post wins
+37320% vs other
Rating winner
Australia Post wins
+112% vs other
Why Etracker TimeSync is winning
Top 2 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Etracker TimeSync earns roughly 70× more per month than Australia Post - $70 vs $0.
- Subscription model. Etracker TimeSync runs a $65.13/mo subscription that compounds; Australia Post relies on one-shot IAP or ads.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Etracker TimeSync report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Australia Post
vs
Etracker TimeSync
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$0
▶
$70
Annual revenue (est.)
$0
▶
$837
Lifetime installs (est.)
104K
◀
400
Monthly active users (est.)?
12K
◀
33.2
App Store rating
4.77★
◀
2.25★
Total ratings
1K
◀
4
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
▶
$65.13
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
▶
1 tiers
- Category
- Business
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jul 10, 2010
- Last updated
- Apr 22, 2026
- File size
- 70.7 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 7.9.7
- Languages
- English
- Category
- Business
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Feb 18, 2025
- Last updated
- Apr 1, 2025
- File size
- 26.0 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 1.1
- Languages
- English
Australia Post trajectory
Etracker TimeSync trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Australia Post or Etracker TimeSync? v
Etracker TimeSync earns about $70 per month, while Australia Post earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap (~$70 more per month for Etracker TimeSync). Annual revenue: Australia Post ≈ $0/year, Etracker TimeSync ≈ $837/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Australia Post or Etracker TimeSync? v
Australia Post leads with about 104K estimated downloads vs 400 for Etracker TimeSync - a 261.0× gap. Australia Post's App Store downloads are estimated from 1K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Etracker TimeSync's App Store downloads are estimated from 4 ratings.
Are Australia Post and Etracker TimeSync in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Business category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Australia Post and Etracker TimeSync offer? v
Australia Post: no IAP detected on the public listing. Etracker TimeSync: IAP range 1 tiers detected. Australia Post runs a "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)" monetization model; Etracker TimeSync runs "Subscription (~$65.13/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Australia Post or Etracker TimeSync? v
Australia Post edges ahead with ★ 4.8 vs ★ 2.3 (gap of 2.5 stars). Rating volume: Australia Post 1K ratings, Etracker TimeSync 4 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Australia Post vs Etracker TimeSync revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $0 for Australia Post and $70 for Etracker TimeSync are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Business) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Australia Post or Etracker TimeSync to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.