Australian Financial Review vs Pocket Casts: Podcast Player
Australian Financial Review
Fairfax Digital Australia & New Zealand Pty Limited
App Store
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 400 installs
VS
Pocket Casts: Podcast Player
Automattic
App Store
$105.6K/mo
~$1.27M/yr · 1.5M installs
Revenue winner
Pocket Casts: Podcast Player wins
+10562000% vs other
Installs winner
Pocket Casts: Podcast Player wins
+386495% vs other
MAU winner
Pocket Casts: Podcast Player wins
+426835% vs other
Rating winner
Pocket Casts: Podcast Player wins
+40% vs other
Why Pocket Casts: Podcast Player is winning
Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Pocket Casts: Podcast Player earns roughly 105620× more per month than Australian Financial Review - $105.6K vs $0.
- Subscription model. Pocket Casts: Podcast Player runs a $3.99/mo subscription that compounds; Australian Financial Review relies on one-shot IAP or ads.
- Bigger install base. Pocket Casts: Podcast Player has ~1.5M lifetime installs vs Australian Financial Review's ~400 - 3865.9× the funnel top.
- More monetization surfaces. Pocket Casts: Podcast Player runs 5 IAP tiers vs 0 - more chances to convert users at the right price.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Pocket Casts: Podcast Player report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Australian Financial Review
vs
Pocket Casts: Podcast Player
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$0
▶
$105.6K
Annual revenue (est.)
$0
▶
$1.27M
Lifetime installs (est.)
400
▶
1.5M
Monthly active users (est.)?
92
▶
393K
App Store rating
3.20★
▶
4.47★
Total ratings
5
▶
14K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
▶
$3.99
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
▶
5 tiers
- Category
- News
- Price
- Free
- Released
- May 21, 2012
- Last updated
- Apr 23, 2026
- File size
- 133.2 MB
- Content rating
- 12+
- Version
- 5.10.0
- Languages
- English
- Category
- News
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jan 26, 2011
- Last updated
- Apr 27, 2026
- File size
- 155.6 MB
- Content rating
- 9+
- Version
- 8.10
- Languages
- Catalan, Dutch, English, French, German, Italian +7 more
Australian Financial Review trajectory
Pocket Casts: Podcast Player trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Australian Financial Review or Pocket Casts: Podcast Player? v
Pocket Casts: Podcast Player earns about $105.6K per month, while Australian Financial Review earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap (~$105.6K more per month for Pocket Casts: Podcast Player). Annual revenue: Australian Financial Review ≈ $0/year, Pocket Casts: Podcast Player ≈ $1.27M/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Australian Financial Review or Pocket Casts: Podcast Player? v
Pocket Casts: Podcast Player leads with about 1.5M estimated downloads vs 400 for Australian Financial Review - a 3865.9× gap. Australian Financial Review's App Store downloads are estimated from 5 ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Pocket Casts: Podcast Player's App Store downloads are estimated from 14K ratings.
Are Australian Financial Review and Pocket Casts: Podcast Player in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the News category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Australian Financial Review and Pocket Casts: Podcast Player offer? v
Australian Financial Review: no IAP detected on the public listing. Pocket Casts: Podcast Player: IAP range 5 tiers detected. Australian Financial Review runs a "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)" monetization model; Pocket Casts: Podcast Player runs "Subscription (~$8.33/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Australian Financial Review or Pocket Casts: Podcast Player? v
Pocket Casts: Podcast Player edges ahead with ★ 4.5 vs ★ 3.2 (gap of 1.3 stars). Rating volume: Australian Financial Review 5 ratings, Pocket Casts: Podcast Player 14K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Australian Financial Review vs Pocket Casts: Podcast Player revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $0 for Australian Financial Review and $105.6K for Pocket Casts: Podcast Player are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (News) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Australian Financial Review or Pocket Casts: Podcast Player to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.