Avaz AAC vs CITB MAP HS&E test V10
Avaz AAC
Avaz, Inc.
App Store
$475/mo
~$5.7K/yr · 16K installs
VS
CITB MAP HS&E test V10
CITB
App Store
$75/mo
~$895/yr · 400 installs
Revenue winner
Avaz AAC wins
+533% vs other
Installs winner
Avaz AAC wins
+3788% vs other
MAU winner
Avaz AAC wins
+3530% vs other
Rating winner
CITB MAP HS&E test V10 wins
+21% vs other
Why Avaz AAC is winning
Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Avaz AAC earns roughly 6× more per month than CITB MAP HS&E test V10 - $475 vs $75.
- Subscription model. Avaz AAC runs a $9.99/mo subscription that compounds; CITB MAP HS&E test V10 relies on one-shot IAP or ads.
- Bigger install base. Avaz AAC has ~16K lifetime installs vs CITB MAP HS&E test V10's ~400 - 38.9× the funnel top.
- More monetization surfaces. Avaz AAC runs 4 IAP tiers vs 0 - more chances to convert users at the right price.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Avaz AAC report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
vs
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$475
◀
$75
Annual revenue (est.)
$5.7K
◀
$895
Lifetime installs (est.)
16K
◀
400
Monthly active users (est.)?
2K
◀
48.4
App Store rating
4.14★
▶
5.00★
Total ratings
311
◀
1
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$9.99
◀
No sub
IAP tiers detected
4 tiers
◀
0 tiers
- Category
- Education
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Oct 21, 2014
- Last updated
- Feb 13, 2026
- File size
- 166.8 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 8.0.4
- Languages
- English
- Category
- Education
- Price
- USD6.99
- Released
- May 2, 2023
- Last updated
- Jan 8, 2026
- File size
- 174.3 MB
- Content rating
- 12+
- Version
- 2.0.14
- Languages
- English
Avaz AAC trajectory
CITB MAP HS&E test V10 trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Avaz AAC or CITB MAP HS&E test V10? v
Avaz AAC earns about $475 per month, while CITB MAP HS&E test V10 earns about $75. That is a 6.3× revenue gap (~$400 more per month for Avaz AAC). Annual revenue: Avaz AAC ≈ $5.7K/year, CITB MAP HS&E test V10 ≈ $895/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Avaz AAC or CITB MAP HS&E test V10? v
Avaz AAC leads with about 16K estimated downloads vs 400 for CITB MAP HS&E test V10 - a 38.9× gap. Avaz AAC's App Store downloads are estimated from 311 ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. CITB MAP HS&E test V10's App Store downloads are estimated from 1 ratings.
Are Avaz AAC and CITB MAP HS&E test V10 in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Education category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Avaz AAC and CITB MAP HS&E test V10 offer? v
Avaz AAC: IAP range 4 tiers detected. CITB MAP HS&E test V10: no IAP detected on the public listing. Avaz AAC runs a "Subscription (~$8.33/mo)" monetization model; CITB MAP HS&E test V10 runs "Paid app ($6.99)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Avaz AAC or CITB MAP HS&E test V10? v
CITB MAP HS&E test V10 edges ahead with ★ 5.0 vs ★ 4.1 (gap of 0.9 stars). Rating volume: Avaz AAC 311 ratings, CITB MAP HS&E test V10 1 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Avaz AAC vs CITB MAP HS&E test V10 revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $475 for Avaz AAC and $75 for CITB MAP HS&E test V10 are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Education) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Avaz AAC or CITB MAP HS&E test V10 to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.
