AWA : 1.7億曲の音楽が聴き放題の人気音楽配信アプリ vs Qobuz: Music & Editorial
AWA : 1.7億曲の音楽が聴き放題の人気音楽配信アプリ
AWA株式会社
Google Play
$393.3K/mo
~$4.72M/yr · 6.6M installs
VS
Qobuz: Music & Editorial
Qobuz
Google Play
$68.6K/mo
~$823.2K/yr · 2.3M installs
Revenue winner
AWA : 1.7億曲の音楽が聴き放題の人気音楽配信アプリ wins
+473% vs other
Installs winner
AWA : 1.7億曲の音楽が聴き放題の人気音楽配信アプリ wins
+191% vs other
MAU winner
AWA : 1.7億曲の音楽が聴き放題の人気音楽配信アプリ wins
+196% vs other
Rating winner
AWA : 1.7億曲の音楽が聴き放題の人気音楽配信アプリ wins
+6% vs other
Why AWA : 1.7億曲の音楽が聴き放題の人気音楽配信アプリ is winning
Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- AWA : 1.7億曲の音楽が聴き放題の人気音楽配信アプリ earns roughly 6× more per month than Qobuz: Music & Editorial - $393.3K vs $68.6K.
- Subscription model. AWA : 1.7億曲の音楽が聴き放題の人気音楽配信アプリ runs a $8.02/mo subscription that compounds; Qobuz: Music & Editorial relies on one-shot IAP or ads.
- Bigger install base. AWA : 1.7億曲の音楽が聴き放題の人気音楽配信アプリ has ~6.6M lifetime installs vs Qobuz: Music & Editorial's ~2.3M - 2.9× the funnel top.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full AWA : 1.7億曲の音楽が聴き放題の人気音楽配信アプリ report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
AWA : 1.7億曲の音楽が聴き放題の人気音楽配信アプリ
vs
Qobuz: Music & Editorial
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$393.3K
◀
$68.6K
Annual revenue (est.)
$4.72M
◀
$823.2K
Lifetime installs (est.)
6.6M
◀
2.3M
Monthly active users (est.)?
1.4M
◀
476K
App Store rating
4.78★
◀
4.52★
Total ratings
52K
▶
74K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$8.02
◀
No sub
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Music & Audio
- Price
- Free
- Released
- -
- Last updated
- Apr 15, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- VARY
- Languages
- -
- Category
- Music & Audio
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Nov 5, 2014
- Last updated
- Apr 29, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Teen
- Version
- VARY
- Languages
- -
AWA : 1.7億曲の音楽が聴き放題の人気音楽配信アプリ trajectory
Qobuz: Music & Editorial trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, AWA : 1.7億曲の音楽が聴き放題の人気音楽配信アプリ or Qobuz: Music & Editorial? v
AWA : 1.7億曲の音楽が聴き放題の人気音楽配信アプリ earns about $393.3K per month, while Qobuz: Music & Editorial earns about $68.6K. That is a 5.7× revenue gap (~$324.7K more per month for AWA : 1.7億曲の音楽が聴き放題の人気音楽配信アプリ). Annual revenue: AWA : 1.7億曲の音楽が聴き放題の人気音楽配信アプリ ≈ $4.72M/year, Qobuz: Music & Editorial ≈ $823.2K/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, AWA : 1.7億曲の音楽が聴き放題の人気音楽配信アプリ or Qobuz: Music & Editorial? v
AWA : 1.7億曲の音楽が聴き放題の人気音楽配信アプリ leads with about 6.6M estimated downloads vs 2.3M for Qobuz: Music & Editorial - a 2.9× gap. AWA : 1.7億曲の音楽が聴き放題の人気音楽配信アプリ reports 5,000,000+ installs on Google Play. Qobuz: Music & Editorial reports 1,000,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are AWA : 1.7億曲の音楽が聴き放題の人気音楽配信アプリ and Qobuz: Music & Editorial in the same Google Play category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Music & Audio category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do AWA : 1.7億曲の音楽が聴き放題の人気音楽配信アプリ and Qobuz: Music & Editorial offer? v
AWA : 1.7億曲の音楽が聴き放題の人気音楽配信アプリ: IAP range $0.99 - $64.99 per item. Qobuz: Music & Editorial: IAP range $15.29 per item. AWA : 1.7億曲の音楽が聴き放題の人気音楽配信アプリ runs a "Subscription (~$8.02/mo)" monetization model; Qobuz: Music & Editorial runs "Free + IAP (tiers not exposed by store)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, AWA : 1.7億曲の音楽が聴き放題の人気音楽配信アプリ or Qobuz: Music & Editorial? v
AWA : 1.7億曲の音楽が聴き放題の人気音楽配信アプリ edges ahead with ★ 4.8 vs ★ 4.5 (gap of 0.3 stars). Rating volume: AWA : 1.7億曲の音楽が聴き放題の人気音楽配信アプリ 4 ratings, Qobuz: Music & Editorial 4K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these AWA : 1.7億曲の音楽が聴き放題の人気音楽配信アプリ vs Qobuz: Music & Editorial revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $393.3K for AWA : 1.7億曲の音楽が聴き放題の人気音楽配信アプリ and $68.6K for Qobuz: Music & Editorial are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Music & Audio) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare AWA : 1.7億曲の音楽が聴き放題の人気音楽配信アプリ or Qobuz: Music & Editorial to a different Google Play app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.